Pa. House of Representatives to pare 63 staffers through buyout |

Pa. House of Representatives to pare 63 staffers through buyout

Deb Erdley

In the category of “let’s make government act more like a business,” PennLIVE reported the Pennsylvania House of Representatives is primed to shed 63 employees under a new buyout deal.

Employee buyouts have become increasingly popular in recent years by businesses looking to pare their payrolls. Such deals typically offer longtime employees financial incentives based on years of service — say a lump sum payment equal to a week’s pay for each year worked — to leave. That frees employers to reduce their costs either by eliminating positions or hiring new employees at entry-level salaries.

PennLIVE reported the House of Representatives offered employees $1,000 a year for each year worked up to 25 years.

Legislative staffers range from a handful of executive committee staffers, attorneys and analysts who earn six-figure salaries to part-time aides who earn $10 an hour.

There was no word on who is leaving or just how much the program represents in savings to taxpayers.

But staff departures represent only a small fraction of those employed by the state House.

According to state records, the 203-member House of Representatives has a staff of about 1,600 full- and part-time employees as of Aug. 15, two weeks before the buyout offer ended.

Records for the same period show the state’s 50 senators had a staff of about 825 full- and part-time employees.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania | Top Stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.