State police: Animals suffer in hot cars just like humans | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

State police: Animals suffer in hot cars just like humans

Patrick Varine
1243880_web1_gtr-PetsinCar-060419
Tribune-Review file
A dog hangs out in the parking lot of the Moose Lodge in Sutersville, on Monday, Sept. 10, 2018.

State police are reminding residents as warmer weather comes on: Don’t leave your pet in the car.

A little less than two years ago, Gov. Tom Wolf signed Act 104, also known as the “Hot Car Bill,” which provides protection for law enforcement and emergency responders when a dog or cat is removed from a motor vehicle when showing signs of distress.

“Properly caring for and protecting your pets should be a priority for all pet owners,” state police animal cruelty officer Michael Spada said.

Animals can suffer from heat exhaustion and heat stroke just like humans, police said.

If emergency officials are notified a pet inside a car is in imminent danger, they are permitted to take “reasonable steps” to ensure or restore the animal’s well-being. They must, however make a reasonable effort to locate the driver, and use no more force than necessary to enter a vehicle.

They must leave notice about where the pet can be retrieved.

The law does not give civilians authority to take this type of action. Anyone who sees a pet in a vehicle which appears to be in distress is asked to call local authorities.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.