‘Strangest thing’: Police say man tried to rob West Manchester bank, then did this … | TribLIVE.com

‘Strangest thing’: Police say man tried to rob West Manchester bank, then did this …


YORK, Pa. — A man attempted to rob a Wells Fargo bank branch in West Manchester Wednesday morning, then waited for authorities to arrive, West Manchester Township Police said.

About 11:30 a.m. Nov. 27, the suspect allegedly jumped over the counter and grabbed money out of the register before throwing the money on the floor and sitting in a chair in the lobby, said Police Chief John Snyder.

“This is the strangest thing I’ve seen in a while,” Snyder said. “I don’t understand why a person would attempt to rob a bank and then throw money down and sit and wait for us to arrive.”

The suspect was arrested by police at the bank, located at the 1400 block of Loucks Road, shortly after they arrived.

Police identified the man as Ricky Magic Johnson, 29, of the York area, in a Thursday, Nov. 28 news release. A home address was not listed in court records.

Johnson was charged with robbery that threatened immediate serious injury and robbery from a financial institution, court records state.

As of Thursday, Johnson remained in York County Prison on $50,000 bail, according to records.

Johnson’s preliminary hearing is scheduled for Jan. 14, records state.

All the money was recovered, according to the Thursday news release.

Nobody was injured and no weapons were visibly found on the suspect, Snyder said Wednesday.

Snyder said he was unsure of a motive.

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.