Texas report: Pennsylvania 2nd only to us in natural gas production | TribLIVE.com

Texas report: Pennsylvania 2nd only to us in natural gas production

Stephen Huba
Tribune-Review File
A pond below a drilling rig used to extract natural gas from the Marcellus shale near Houston in Washington County in 2008.

Texas may be the biggest natural gas producer in the country, but Pennsylvania isn’t far behind — and it’s gaining.

A Texas oil and gas trade association acknowledged as much in its recently-released 2019 State of Energy Report.

The report by the Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association, or TIPRO, put Pennsylvania at No. 2, with 6.1 trillion cubic feet of natural gas produced in 2018. Production in 2017 was 5.4 trillion cubic feet.

Pennsylvania, with its active Marcellus and Utica shale plays, began to take the second spot when it outpaced Louisiana around 2013, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

The EIA noted that Pennsylvania has experienced an increase in permitting and drilling activity with the expansion of regional pipeline capacity capable of moving natural gas to market centers outside of production areas — most recently the Mariner East 2 pipeline which came online in December.

Pennsylvania also had a second consecutive year of oil and gas employment growth in 2018, according to the TIPRO report. The state ranks fifth in the country for number of oil and gas jobs (30,193 in 2018) and saw a 7.6 percent increase from 2017.

Pennsylvania ranks 16th for average annual wage ($99,140 in 2018) and sixth for total oil and gas payroll ($2.9 billion), according to the report.

Pennsylvania ranks sixth for number of oil and gas businesses (1,375), the report said.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.