ShareThis Page
White Oak lawyer to seek judge seat on Pennsylvania Superior Court | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

White Oak lawyer to seek judge seat on Pennsylvania Superior Court

Deb Erdley
| Monday, February 4, 2019 12:09 p.m
710484_web1_Ryan-James
Submitted
Ryan James, a 34-year-old attorney from White Oak, plans to run for spot on the Pennsylvania Superior Court. Ryan James, a 34-year-old attorney from White Oak, plans to run for spot on the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

Allegheny County defense attorney Ryan James, 34, of White Oak, will seek the nomination to the Pennsylvania Superior Court, he announced Monday.

Two 10-year terms are up for grabs on the statewide appellate court that hears first appeals on most criminal and civil court rulings.

After getting a law degree from Western Michigan University, James began practicing in the spare room of his home, eventually establishing a McKeesport area criminal defense law firm, James Law LLC. He has tried criminal cases before the Common Pleas courts and has argued appeals cases before the state Superior Court.

“Every day I’m doing the work that most frequently comes before the Superior Court and makes up a majority of its busy docket. I’m not a politician, I’m just a lawyer who’s familiar and interested with the court’s work and appreciates how the cases it decides have far-reaching effects on the lives of all Pennsylvanians, not just the people appearing before it,” James said in a statement.

James said he, his wife, Kristen, and their son, Oake, plan to move this year to North Huntingdon, Westmoreland County.


Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.


Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.