Woodpeckers die when stuck on Spotted Lanternfly traps | TribLIVE.com
Pennsylvania

Woodpeckers die when stuck on Spotted Lanternfly traps

Mary Ann Thomas
1333437_web1_Lanternfly1
Courtesy Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture
Lateral view of an adult Lycorma delicatula, also known as the Spotted Lanternfly.

Bands of sticky tape installed on trees to ensnare and kill the pesky and invasive Spotted Lanternfly are backfiring and killing some birds, bats and other wildlife that inadvertently get stuck, according to media and other accounts.

The Morning Call reports the sticky tape is entrapping woodpeckers, squirrels and other animals causing outcries from animal rehabilitation centers and other nature groups.

Animal rehabilitators have reporting receiving injured animals because of the sticky tape.

In the Morning Call article, an ornithologist said the sticky bands are one of the worst ideas he has seen.

However, a Penn State lanternfly expert said animal deaths aren’t common and there are ways to prevent the mishaps.

In fact, Penn State created a fact sheet to teach people how to use the sticky bands without harming other wildlife.

An invasive species, the Spotted Lanternfly has been a scourge in the southeastern part of the state, where it can cause heavy damage to agriculture and landscapes, including grape, tree-fruit, hardwood and nursery stock, according to the Penn State Agricultural Extension.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Pennsylvania
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.