ShareThis Page
Pitt graduate workers blast university for union suppression tactics | TribLIVE.com
Education

Pitt graduate workers blast university for union suppression tactics

Deb Erdley
| Tuesday, March 12, 2019 5:43 p.m
871847_web1_web-pitt4
The Cathedral of Learning on the University of Pittsburgh campus in Oakland

Graduate student workers at the University of Pittsburgh say school officials are trying to suppress voter turnout for an upcoming union election by insisting it be held at two locations removed from the center of the Oakland campus.

Last week, the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board ruled against the university’s attempts to halt a union election by the Graduate Student Organizing Committee and the United Steelworkers. Pitt officials had contested their calls for an election, saying the graduate student teaching and research assistants were students, not university employees.

The group began organizing under the auspices of the Pittsburgh-based United Steelworkers in January 2016 and filed for a union election in December 2017.

Some 2,000 graduate student teaching and research assistants are eligible to vote in the union election.

Now organizers say university administrators are attempting to push the PLRB and the union to hold the election at the Biomedical Science Tower and Benedum Hall, the home of Swanson School of Engineering, rather than buildings in the campus center like the William Pitt Union or the Cathedral of Learning.

“Keep the vote fair by locating polling places in a convenient place for the most grads. Anything less amounts to the administration’s continued disregard for the rights of its grad student employees,” Patrick Beckhorn, a teaching fellow in the Anthropology Department said in a statement charging Pitt with trying to limit participation in the vote to be held later this spring.

Pitt officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.