ShareThis Page
Accused Tree of Life gunman Robert Bowers to be arraigned Monday |

Accused Tree of Life gunman Robert Bowers to be arraigned Monday

Megan Guza
| Friday, February 8, 2019 6:16 p.m
Robert D. Bowers

Accused Tree of Life gunman Robert Bowers will be arraigned on 63 charges Monday in federal court.

Bowers was originally indicted last year on 44 federal charges related to the Oct. 27 shooting that left 11 people dead inside the Squirrel Hill synagogue.

A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment Jan. 29 that added 19 new charges. Those charges included 13 hate crime-related charges and six corresponding firearms charges.

Twenty-two of the counts against Bowers are punishable by death.

Bowers allegedly targeted the synagogue because one the congregations housed there, Dor Hadash, hosted refugee-related events. The congregation was on a list published by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which Bowers allegedly railed against online, according to the indictment.

Shortly before the 9:45 a.m. massacre, Bowers allegedly posted to, “HIAS likes to bring invaders in that kill our people. I can’t sit by and watch my people get slaughtered. Screw your optics, I’m going in.”

The indictment also alleges Bowers made statements about his desire to “kill Jews” and had previously written on Gab that “Jews are the children of Satan.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.