ShareThis Page
Botched SWAT raid would cost Pittsburgh $80,000 under proposed legal settlement |

Botched SWAT raid would cost Pittsburgh $80,000 under proposed legal settlement

Bob Bauder
| Tuesday, January 22, 2019 3:29 p.m
Tabatha Werkmeister of Pittsburgh’s Brighton Heights neighborhood during a 2015 interview describes how city SWAT officers broke down her front door during a raid in 2014 after mistaking her home for a suspect’s.

Pittsburgh would pay a Brighton Heights woman $80,000 to settle a lawsuit alleging city SWAT officers five years ago wrongly broke down her front door and terrorized her children after mistaking her apartment for a drug dealer’s.

City Council on Tuesday introduced a resolution that would end the lawsuit filed after the police raid. Council members fast-tracked the resolution so they can vote on it for a first time Wednesday. A final vote would be scheduled for Jan. 29.

Tim McNulty, spokesman for Mayor Bill Peduto, declined comment.

Downtown attorney Margaret Coleman said her client Tabatha Werkmeister lives in a duplex and officers chose the wrong door when they arrived on Jan. 25, 2014. Officers broke through the door, threw in a smoke grenade, carried off two of Werkmeister’s sons and then escorted her and other people in the house, including two other children, to a SWAT van at gunpoint, according to the lawsuit.

“It was not malicious, but it was entirely reckless,” Coleman said. “When you’re using that level of paramilitary force on civilians the city has to be extremely careful that they’re doing it to the right people. Here there were multiple opportunities to make sure they had the right door and they just didn’t bother.”

She said Werkmeister’s children are now afraid of police officers and Werkmeister has not slept in her bedroom because it’s on an upper floor and she wants to be closer to her kids at night.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter @bobbauder.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.