ShareThis Page
Bridgeville suboxone clinic owner gets federal prison sentence, fine |

Bridgeville suboxone clinic owner gets federal prison sentence, fine

Chuck Biedka
| Friday, February 8, 2019 6:53 p.m

An Upper St. Clair woman was sentenced Friday to serve more than a year in federal prison and pay a fine for violating federal drug dispensing laws and defrauding an insurance company.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer sentenced Terri C. Brown, 53, of Morrow Road to a year and five months in prison and supervised release after that. Fisher also ordered Brown to pay about $4,800 in restitution to Highmark.

Brown owned and operated Cherry Way, a suboxone clinic in Bridgeville.

The government said she conspired with co-defendant, Mark Foster, who was the medical director at Cherry Way, to submit illegal prescriptions for the painkillers suboxone, Adderall and Percocet, and then illegally dispensed those drugs to Brown and others.

According to court reports, in October Foster pleaded guilty to three charges. Sentencing is scheduled for May 31.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert S. Cessar prosecuted the case.

The investigation leading to the filing of charges in these cases was conducted by the Western Pennsylvania Opioid Fraud and Abuse Detection Unit.

(An earlier version of this story had an incorrect sentencing date for Foster.)

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.