ShareThis Page
Former Duquesne basketball player pleads to disorderly conduct in 2017 rape case | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Former Duquesne basketball player pleads to disorderly conduct in 2017 rape case

Megan Guza
| Monday, February 4, 2019 1:40 p.m
711023_web1_GavelNewN

A former Duquesne University basketball player initially charged with rape and sexual assault in 2017 pleaded guilty Monday to disorderly conduct.

Nick Washington, 21, received a sentence of one year of probation in exchange for the guilty plea to disorderly conduct, court records show.

Charges of rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault were withdrawn.

“The charges were withdrawn due to evidentiary reasons and with the consent of the victim,” said Mike Manko, spokesman for the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

The victim in the case alleged that she met Washington at a party and went to the university’s campus with Washington and two others, according to the original complaint. She said that her cell phone died, and she went with Washington to his room to use his charger. There, she alleged, he assaulted her, according to the complaint.

As part of his probation, Washington must have no contact with the victim.


Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, mguza@tribweb.com or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.


Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, mguza@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.