ShareThis Page
Overbrook residents win round 3 in legal battle with PWSA | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Overbrook residents win round 3 in legal battle with PWSA

Bob Bauder
| Friday, January 18, 2019 4:30 p.m
653905_web1_ptr-sewerdispute02-041016
Homehurst Avenue in Overbrook on Saturday, April 9, 2016.

Residents of Homehurst Avenue in Pittsburgh’s Overbrook neighborhood have won round three in a long-running battle with the Pittsburgh Water Sewer Authority over a sewer line on their street.

Five residents — Natalie Leon, Jaime Wagner, Louise Sell, Christopher Cratsley and James Rauber — contend that PWSA has refused since 2014 to repair a faulty line. PWSA contends the line is private and the responsibility of property owners to maintain.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Robert J. Colville on Tuesday sided with an Allegheny Health Department hearing officer, who has twice ruled that the line is public and should be repaired by PWSA. PWSA in 2017 appealed the ruling in county court.

“We’re happy,” Leon said on Friday. “We hope that PWSA will step up to the plate, meet their obligation and fix our line. This is ridiculous. It’s been over four years now.”

It was unclear if PWSA would mount another appeal.

“We’re reviewing the decision and considering our options,” spokesman Will Pickering said. He declined further comment.

Residents in April filed a complaint pending before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

They contend that Pittsburgh had maintained the line for 80 years since it annexed a portion of Baldwin Township that included their street. They said PWSA declared it private in 2014 when it ruptured and spewed raw sewage into the street.

PWSA that year filed a complaint with the health department, which has jurisdiction because of the public health hazard.

The heath department sided with the residents on two occasions, ruling that PWSA failed to provide evidence that the line was privately installed and that “government entities, not individual homeowners” were responsible for the cost of repairs and maintenance.


Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter @bobbauder.


Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.