ShareThis Page
Package thief who stole from Pittsburgh apartments gets 15 months in prison |

Package thief who stole from Pittsburgh apartments gets 15 months in prison

Natasha Lindstrom
| Wednesday, February 13, 2019 2:35 p.m

A Duquesne man will spend 15 months behind bars for stealing packages from more than 40 residents of Pittsburgh apartment buildings, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.

Ron Matthew Sharp, 42, pleaded guilty in October to mail theft after stealing dozens of packages and mail addressed to residents of apartment buildings in Pittsburgh’s Oakland and Shadyside neighborhoods, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

Sharp also was convicted of conspiracy for acting with a partner and instructing others to resell the stolen goods.

The prison sentence imposed by U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon will be followed by three years of parole.

Brady accused Sharp and co-conspirator Christopher Carr of stealing packages and mail left at authorized mail depositories within the apartment complexes and “filling up trash bags, duffel bags and backpacks with their loot,” according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The pair then re-sold or used the stolen items, including gift cards they redeemed at places such as Giant Eagle and GetGo stores, prosecutors said.

Carr is scheduled to be sentenced on March 12.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy C. Wiegand prosecuted the case with help from investigators at the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and Homeland Security.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.