ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh jury indicts 2 in bank robbery spree case; 3rd suspect to plead guilty | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh jury indicts 2 in bank robbery spree case; 3rd suspect to plead guilty

Natasha Lindstrom
| Wednesday, February 13, 2019 8:25 p.m
716331_web1_money

A federal grand jury this week indicted two of three people accused of a string of armed bank robberies in Pittsburgh and its suburbs in October, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said y.

Nicole Wallace, 34, of Carnegie and Edward Hooten, 42, of Pittsburgh face charges that carry maximum sentences of up to 25 years in prison and fines up to $250,000.

In mid-November, Pittsburgh police arrested and detained Wallace, Hooten and Jason Rini of Heidelberg as suspects in connection to three bank robberies.

Officials did not disclose how much money was stolen.

Rini waived his right to an indictment by a grand jury, U.S. Attorney’s Office spokeswoman Margaret Philbin said. He is scheduled to plead guilty at a hearing later this month.

The federal grand jury on Tuesday charged both Wallace and Hooten in the armed robbery of the Huntington Bank on Brownsville Road in Carrick on Oct. 17.

Wallace was charged in the attempted armed robbery of First National Bank in Whitehall on Oct. 27, and the armed robbery of First National Bank in Pittsburgh’s Shadyside neighborhood on Oct. 29.

The Allegheny County Sheriff’s Task Force and FBI Violent Crimes Task Force assisted Pittsburgh police in the investigation.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicole Vasquez Schmitt is prosecuting the case with help from the FBI.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, nlindstrom@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.