ShareThis Page
Upper St. Clair dog attacked by rabid raccoon |

Upper St. Clair dog attacked by rabid raccoon

Dillon Carr
| Wednesday, January 23, 2019 1:30 a.m

The Allegheny County Health Department said Wednesday a raccoon found in Upper St. Clair tested positive for rabies.

In a news release, ACHD said the raccoon was “involved in an altercation” with a dog on Shenandoah Drive in Upper St. Clair. The dog was up-to-date on its rabies vaccinations.

The health department said the raccoon is the county’s first rabid animal case in 2019. There were 25 confirmed cases of rabies in animals in 2018. Those included 12 raccoons, nine bats, one fox and one groundhog. The final number of confirmed rabies cases in 2018 are not final, however, because the state Health Department has yet to release a rabies report.

ACHD warned residents to always avoid wild and stray animals to avoid exposure to rabies, “even if they appear healthy.”

“If any animal appears to be acting strange or becomes threatening, residents should immediately notify local animal control service, the police or Pennsylvania Game Commission,” said the news release.

The health department also warned residents to watch their pets closely and make sure they are updated with vaccinations.

The rabies virus is transmitted by an animal bite or scratch and are “almost always fatal when left untreated,” said ACHD.

Anyone who has been bitten, scratched or exposed to saliva from a stray or other animal should clean the contact area with soap and water, seek emergency medical treatment and call ACHD at 412-687-2243 to report the incident.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 412-871-2325, or via Twitter @dillonswriting.

Dillon Carr is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Dillon at 724-850-1298, or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.