2020 Democrats confronting debate over letting felons vote | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

2020 Democrats confronting debate over letting felons vote

Associated Press
1067307_web1_1067307-c8d096712a2840e29b15d8fb658301e4
In this April 15, 2019 photo, Sen. Bernie Sanders takes part in a Fox News town-hall style event in Bethlehem, Pa.

Democratic presidential contenders are facing a new debate over whether criminals in prison, even notorious ones like the Boston Marathon bomber, should be able to win back their right to vote.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders says they should and that voting is “inherent to our democracy — yes, even for terrible people.” Many of his rivals for the 2020 nomination aren’t so sure, and at least one opposes the idea outright. Sanders himself acknowledged that he was essentially writing an attack ad for Republicans to use against him through his support for the issue.

The question illustrates how Sanders continues to stand to the left of the other candidates as he endorses giving prisoners, including those convicted of heinous crimes, the right to vote. Prodded by criminal justice activists, Democrats have largely embraced the politically safer cause of winning back access to the ballot box for felons who have served their time.

“Sen. Sanders is taking it one step farther than most campaigns have,” said Mark Mauer of The Sentencing Project, a group that advocates letting prisoners vote. “Even if you’re sitting in a maximum-security prison, you retain most of the fundamental rights of a U.S. citizen.”

Only two states now allow prisoners to vote — Maine and Vermont, Sanders’ home state. Asked Monday during a CNN town hall whether he supported allowing sex offenders or terrorists such as marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to vote, Sanders did not hesitate.

“The right to vote is inherent to our democracy — yes, even for terrible people,” Sanders said. “Once you start chipping away and you say, ‘Well, that guy committed a terrible crime, not going to let him vote. Oh, that person did that, not going to let that person vote.’ You’re running down a slippery slope.”

At the same town hall, California Sen. Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor, stressed that she backed restoring voting rights to released convicts. Of those in prison, she said, “I think we should have that conversation.”

Harris hedged further on Tuesday. “There has to be serious consequences for the most extreme types of crimes,” she told reporters at a campaign stop.

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren said she supports a constitutional right to vote but is “not there yet” on prisoners voting. Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana, opposes giving prisoners access to the ballot box. “Part of the punishment when you’re convicted of a crime and you’re incarcerated is you lose certain rights,” he said during the town hall.

Republicans were quick to criticize Democrats for even contemplating the idea. The Republican National Committee chairwoman, Ronna McDaniel, tweeted that Democrats were trying to “out-Bernie” each other. “Now they’re refusing to rule out letting terrorists to vote from prison,” she said.

The movement to restore voting rights to convicted felons has had some success in recent years.

Activists won their biggest victory in November when Florida voters overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure reversing the state’s lifetime voting ban for most convicted felons who have completed their sentences. Advocates of a criminal justice overhaul have been able to chip away at restrictions through state legislatures in conservative states such as Kentucky and Alabama.

Chiraag Bains, a Justice Department official in the Obama administration who now works at the liberal think tank Demos, said restoring prisoners’ right to vote is the logical next step in a movement that is trying to reverse laws enacted shortly after slaves won the right to vote. Within 15 years of the end of the Civil War, nearly one-third of the states had laws barring felons and prisoners from voting, and some were explicit about trying to limit the new political power of African-Americans, Bains said.

Restoring the right to vote “is long overdue,” Bains said, noting the bipartisan support for measures loosening restrictions on released felons voting across the South. “I think the public is a lot smarter about criminal justice reform and voting rights” than they’re given credit for.

But beyond Maine and Vermont, no state has gone so far as to loosen restrictions on those serving time behind bars.

The Sentencing Project estimates about 1.3 million citizens cannot vote because they are in prison or jail. Even liberal states such as California bar felons on parole or in prison from voting.

Last year, the activist group Initiate Justice tried to gather signatures for a ballot measure in California allowing all felons to vote, but it didn’t have enough money to fund a campaign. Now it’s trying to persuade the state’s Democratic-controlled Legislature to put a measure on the 2020 ballot — but it would restore voting rights only to parolees, not those in prison.

The group’s founder, Taina Vargas-Edmond, isn’t sure the slimmed-down version will get through the California Legislature. “It has been something of a struggle,” she said. “It’s part of this whole tough-on-crime justice system that we’re all wedded to.”

Vargas-Edmond said it may be an easier political sale to win rights back for parolees, but she believes there’s no need to bar those serving time, either.

“I doubt there’s a single person who ever said, ‘Well, let me not commit this crime because I’ll lose my right to vote,’” she said.

The issue has begun bubbling up in Democratic-run legislatures with increasing frequency, a sign that prisoner voting rights are becoming a legitimate issue, activists say. “We’re in a democratizing moment,” Bains said.

But that doesn’t mean Democrats are united on the issue.

Even in solidly Democratic Hawaii, a measure to let prisoners vote didn’t make it out of the Legislature this year. In New Mexico, a bill to restore some felons’ voting rights made incremental progress but only after a provision to let prisoners vote was removed. The amended bill still died in the Democratic-controlled Legislature.

Although he’s a strong advocate of voting rights for those released from prison, state Sen. Bill O’Neill of New Mexico only signed on as a sponsor after the prison-voting clause was removed.

“That’s too far for me,” O’Neill said. “Practically, I’m just having a really hard time seeing that being implemented, and as a Democrat, I’m already concerned with the attack ads being printed up.”

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.