Analysis: Trump falsely claims there was little religious freedom before his election |
Politics Election

Analysis: Trump falsely claims there was little religious freedom before his election

The Washington Post
Getty Images
President Trump speaks at the National Day of Prayer Service, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington on May 2,2019.
President Trump participates in a National Day of Prayer service in the Rose Garden at the White House on Thursday, May 02, 2019.
President Trump bows his head as first lady Melania Trump says a prayer during a National Day of Prayer event in the Rose Garden of the White House, Thursday, May 2, 2019, in Washington.

WASHINGTON — In his National Day of Prayer speech on Thursday, President Trump focused on how much the United States has changed since his election, particularly for people of faith. The president, who won a large majority of white evangelical Christians and white Catholic voters in 2016, spoke about how difficult life had been for religious Americans before he entered the Oval Office.

“One of the things I’m most proud of,” he said, “is the Johnson amendment. You can now speak your mind — and speak it freely. I said I was going to do that… . That was one of the things I said. They took away your voice politically, and these are the people I want to listen to politically. But you weren’t allowed to speak — they would lose their tax exempt status. That’s not happening anymore, we got rid of the Johnson amendment. That’s a big thing.”

Candidate Trump promised to address those anxieties, championing a handful of issues important to evangelical voters. For example, he frequently pledged to end the Johnson amendment, a federal law that prohibits houses of worship, charitable nonprofits and private foundations from officially endorsing, opposing or financially supporting political candidates and parties. Trump spoke often about the Johnson amendment on the trail.

As president he has repeatedly, falsely claimed to have gotten rid of it. But he hasn’t.

“Trump’s failure to eliminate the Johnson Amendment is not for lack of will. Members of Congress pursued similar goals to the president, attempting to include language that would weaken the law as part of the tax reform bill, but that effort ultimately failed,” David Saperstein, a rabbi and former U.S. ambassador at large for international religious freedom, and Amanda Tyler, the executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, previously wrote in The Washington Post. “And at one point, Trump described his goal of eliminating the prohibition on election activity as potentially his ‘greatest contribution to Christianity — and other religions.’ “

He also said that “people are so proud to be using that beautiful word ‘God.’ And they’re using the word ‘God’ again and they’re not hiding from it. And they’re not being told to take it down and they’re not saying, ‘We can’t honor God.’ In God, we trust. So important.”

Trump claimed that before he took office, “people were not allowed or in some cases, foolishly ashamed to be using on stores ‘Merry Christmas, Happy Christmas.’ They’d say ‘Happy Holidays.’ They’d have red walls and you’d never see ‘Christmas.’ That was four years ago.”

“Take a look at your stores nowadays. It’s all ‘Merry Christmas’ again. They’re proud of it. I always said, ‘You’re going to be saying “Merry Christmas” again.’ And that’s what happened.”

Most of these claims are exaggerated or inaccurate. But they echo a message shared widely among religious conservatives: that Christians in America are under attack by liberals and Democrats.

It’s a talking point that gained significant ground during the Obama administration. “Several major conservative political pundits and organizations have made a name for themselves by selectively highlighting cases of alleged persecution of Christians,” Alan Noble, an English professor at Oklahoma Baptist University, wrote for The Atlantic back in 2014. “The most well-known example is the so-called ‘war on Christmas,’ which is predicated on the claim that the holiday has been secularized by retailers’ marketing choices. Fox News has a reputation for running these sensationalized stories of suspected or alleged discrimination.”

Trump did sign an executive order in 2017 that supporters say makes it easier for churches to participate in politics. But critics called it vague and nowhere near as broad in its changes as Trump promised they’d be when courting conservative Christians.

Those details and facts likely won’t matter much to the conservative people of faith backing Trump. White evangelical support for the president has stayed sold since he entered office. For them, the fact that the president talks the talk may matter as much as whether he walks the walk.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.