Sen. Bob Casey labels Trump call ‘a textbook abuse of power’ | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Sen. Bob Casey labels Trump call ‘a textbook abuse of power’

Deb Erdley
1723942_web1_CaseyRun
AP
Sen. Bob Casey, D-Pa., speaks during a general election campaign event in Philadelphia.

Calling President Trump’s request that the Ukrainian president investigate former Vice President Joe Biden “a textbook case of abuse of power,” Sen. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, on Wednesday called on his colleagues to hold the president accountable and came out firmly in support of a formal House impeachment inquiry.

Speaking to the press following the release of a transcript of Trump’s comments in his July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, Casey said the timing of the call and Trump’s comments one day after the completion of the Mueller hearing aired concerns about Russian interference in the 2016 election, suggest Trump sees himself as invincible.

Trump, who agreed to release a transcript of his comments to Zelenskiy, said his comments were “very friendly and totally appropriate,” and that no pressure was exerted.

Casey insisted the transcript supports his concerns. He said Trump’s decision to bring his personal attorney into the conversation and ask that Zelenskiy cooperate with Rudolph Guiliani underscored the political nature of his request.

“That is a serious, grave circumstance for a president to ask for any favor that has a political objective,” Casey said. “If there is not a law against this, then I’d say damn it, we should pass a law to make it illegal. … This isn’t obstructive conduct that relates to the breaking in of a headquarters in the 1970s. … This isn’t obstructive conduct as we saw in the Clinton years.

“This is conduct related to a foreign adversary interfering with an American election,” Casey said.

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania’s junior senator, released a brief statement that took issue with that. He said Trump’s comments were “inappropriate,” but did not rise to the level of an impeachable offense.

Casey said he has not spoken with Toomey, but said his colleague’s comments, coupled with the Senate’s unanimous vote requiring that the whistleblower’s report that flagged the controversial call be transmitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee, reflect growing concerns about the president’s conduct.

“Not a single senator objected. … All of that is encouraging in a Senate that is often divided on a range of issues,” Casey said. “This reaction indicates the gravity of what we’re talking about here. I don’t think it’s ever happened in American history or in recent history that we know of.”

Although the House, which is in Democratic hands, is responsible for conducting impeachment inquiries, it would be up to the Republican-controlled Senate to vote on whether to convict the president should the House hand down articles of impeachment.

Casey said he would keep an open mind should the House send articles of impeachment to the Senate.

“What I would hope is that impeachment would act as a deterrent, and the president would not abuse his power,” Casey said.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.