Clash between Republicans and Rep. Adam Schiff overshadows Russia intelligence hearing |
Politics Election

Clash between Republicans and Rep. Adam Schiff overshadows Russia intelligence hearing

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., pushes ahead with their oversight of the Trump administration at a hearing to examine to examine ‘Putin’s Playbook,’ how the Russian government works to undermine its adversaries, especially the U.S., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, March 28, 2019.
Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio, calls for the resignation of House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., as the Democrat-controlled panel pushed ahead with their oversight of the Trump administration on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, March 28, 2019. Schiff this week has repeated his assertion that evidence of collusion is in ‘plain sight,’ saying that Mueller’s failure to find a criminal conspiracy with Russia does not absolve the Trump campaign of its actions.
House Select Committee on Intelligence ranking member Devin Nunes, R-Calif., looks on as committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., responds to Republican calls for him to resign as chairman at a hearing concerning 2016 Russian interference tactics in the U.S. elections, in the Rayburn House Office Building, March 28, 2019 in Washington. Every Republican on the committee signed the letter on Thursday demanding that Schiff step down.

WASHINGTON — Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday demanded that Chairman Adam B. Schiff step down from his post in light of his repeated allegations that President Trump’s campaign colluded with Russians in the 2016 election, the latest in growing GOP attacks against the California Democrat.

The heated, partisan back-and-forth at times overshadowed an intelligence hearing intended to discuss Russia’s election interference in 2016 and ongoing threats to the United States.

Days after special counsel Robert Mueller cleared the president of criminal collusion, Republicans have used the report to try to undermine the legitimacy of Schiff and other Democrats who have long accused the president of accepting help from the Russians. The full Mueller report has not been released and only described in a summary by Attorney General William Barr.

“Your willingness to continue to promote a demonstrably false narrative is alarming,” said Rep. Mike Conway, R-Texas. “We have no faith in your ability to discharge your duty.”

Conaway and the other eight Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee submitted a letter calling for Schiff’s resignation during the hearing, where experts testified about Russian President Vladimir Putin’s playbook of using Russian money and intelligence to undermine other countries, including the United States.

Schiff angrily dismissed the claims and accused Republicans of failing to fulfill their oversight responsibilities.

He said he accepted Mueller’s decision not to file an indictment in the case but said it doesn’t change his position that Trump’s campaign was open to Russian assistance.

He went through a litany of evidence that he said suggested collusion, including Trump’s calls for Russians to hack Democrats’ emails; Donald Trump Jr.’s and Jared Kushner’s meetings with Russian officials, and their decision not to go to the FBI afterward.

“I think it’s immoral. I think it’s unethical. I think it’s unpatriotic. And yes, I think it’s corrupt and evidence of collusion,” a visibly angry Schiff said.

Trump has also targeted Schiff, accusing the lawmaker — without providing any evidence — of breaking the law. “Congressman Adam Schiff, who spent two years knowingly and unlawfully lying and leaking, should be forced to resign from Congress!” Trump tweeted shortly before the hearing began.

Rep. Michael Turner, R-Ohio, accused Schiff of operating the panel in a way that poses a “danger to our national security” and acting in “true McCarthy fashion,” a reference to the questionable tactics of former Sen. Joe McCarthy in his anti-Communist campaign.

Schiff said the attacks from Trump and congressional Republicans are “nothing new” and has insisted that he is conducting proper oversight.

Democrats have rallied around Schiff and his position as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a leading voice in the Russia investigation.

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., defended Schiff, saying earlier this week that he expects him to be “chairing that committee for a long time to come.”

Schiff was also just named to a key fundraising chairmanship post at the Democratic committee tasked with preserving the party’s majority in the House.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.