Democrats eye Pennsylvania district that became more favorable turf in 2018 redraw |
Politics Election

Democrats eye Pennsylvania district that became more favorable turf in 2018 redraw

Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The Pennsylvania Capitol in Harrisburg.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s decision last week not to stop partisan gerrymandering was a blow to congressional Democrats who were hoping several states could see more favorable maps for 2020.

But in at least one state, a new map implemented last year to redress partisan gerrymandering is giving Democrats another 2020 pickup opportunity. That map resulted from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that found the old congressional lines violated the state constitution. And Democrats are now looking to other state courts in their fight for less partisan maps.

The excitement from national Democrats about Pennsylvania’s 10th District was on full display Monday, when state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale, a Democrat, announced his candidacy against Republican incumbent Scott Perry, a member of the hard-line conservative House Freedom Caucus.

The Harrisburg-area seat wouldn’t be in play if Perry weren’t running for just the second time in a district that became less Republican under the redrawn map. Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales rates the race “Tilts Republican.” Democrats netted three seats in Pennsylvania during the 2018 midterms under the new lines.

The Keystone State will be a top battleground for the presidential race in 2020, with President Trump already having held several rallies there.

In last week’s decision, the Supreme Court said partisan gerrymandering was too political a question for the federal courts and rejected lower court rulings that the map in North Carolina needed to be redrawn. Plaintiffs are now challenging that map in state court.

“We are confident that justice will prevail in the North Carolina courts,” Bob Phillips, the executive director of Common Cause North Carolina, said in a statement after the ruling.

DePasquale has long been mentioned as a likely candidate for the 10th district. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee followed up his Monday announcement with targeted digital ads against Perry. The Facebook spots seize on comments Perry made during the 2019 partial government shutdown when he questioned whether federal workers were really living paycheck to paycheck.

DePasquale told CQ Roll Call on Monday that Perry’s comments were what first made him think about running for Congress.

Unlike most incumbents, Perry is running in a district that’s still relatively new to him. For his first three terms in Congress, beginning in 2012, he represented the old 4th District, which was safely Republican. But last year’s state Supreme Court decision left him in a district that included about 60% of his old territory, according to calculations from Daily Kos Elections.

Under the new lines, Perry’s district also became less Republican — and that’s a key reason why Democrats think they have a shot at unseating him. He won reelection last fall over Democrat George Scott by less than 3 points. That was a far narrower margin than his previous winning margins: 32 points in 2016, nearly 50 points in 2014 and 25 points in 2012.

Trump would still have carried Perry’s district in 2016 under the new lines, but by a smaller margin — 9 points instead of nearly 22 points, according to Daily Kos Elections calculations.

After Perry’s narrow win last fall, the DCCC put the 10th District on its initial list of 2020 targets, released in January. Scott said last week he won’t be running again this year. That leaves the Democratic field to DePasquale and lawyer Tom Brier, who announced his candidacy earlier this year and raised $100,000 in the first quarter.

DePasquale argues that he can defeat Perry because he carried the new district by 2 points during his 2016 reelection for state auditor general. He defeated Republican John Brown statewide 50% to 45%.

He carried Dauphin County, all of which is in the new 10th District, but lost Cumberland and York counties, both of which are partially in the 10th. Trump won Cumberland and York counties, according to Daily Kos Elections calculations.

“I was able to appeal to a whole bunch of people who voted for him and me,” DePasquale said, referring to the president.

DePasquale is term-limited as auditor general. He declined to say whether he’d be running if the congressional district lines hadn’t changed.

His campaign will be focused on health care — he speaks often about a brother who died from muscular dystrophy — lowering the cost of prescription drugs and investing in alternative energy solutions that will create union jobs.

Asked whether he’d like to see Democrats open an impeachment inquiry into Trump, DePasquale said the president should be held accountable but he’d like to see congressional Democrats legislate.

“There is going to be a judge and jury for the president next November,” he said.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.