ShareThis Page
Donna Brazile: Biden would beat Trump in Pennsylvania despite president’s 2016 win | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Donna Brazile: Biden would beat Trump in Pennsylvania despite president’s 2016 win

Steven Adams
1199636_web1_biden-bg-e4092752-62b9-11e9-9ff2-abc984dc9eec
Michelle Gustafson | Bloomberg
Joe Biden.

Joe Biden can take back a key battleground state that President Donald Trump won in 2016, according to ex-DNC Interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile.

The former vice president can make up the less than one percentage point Trump won by in Pennsylvania over Hillary Clinton, Brazile claimed.

“Look, I think it’s going to be a close election across the country. But, Donald Trump won the state of Pennsylvania by less than 50,000 votes,” she said.

Brazile was speaking during an interview Tuesday on “America’s Newsroom” on Fox News.

“Joe Biden will be able to make that up. But, not just Joe Biden—any one of the Democrats I think can be very competitive in the Keystone State.”

Trump spoke in Montoursville the previous night and blamed Biden for leaving Pennsylvania as a child, reports Fox News.

“Don’t forget: Biden deserted you. He’s not from Pennsylvania. I guess he was born here, but he left you, folks. He left you for another state. Remember that, please,” Trump told the crowd.

Brazile referenced the comment when she said, “He’s well known in Pennsylvania and he’s not the forgotten son. He is the forgotten hero.”

Biden was born in Scranton. He served as Senator from Delaware for more than 30 years.

A Quinnipiac University poll shows Biden beating Trump in Pennsylvania 53 to 42.

Politico reports Biden is also ahead in Wisconsin and Michigan.

Read more at Fox News.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.