House pushes for release of Mueller grand jury testimony |
Politics Election

House pushes for release of Mueller grand jury testimony

Associated Press
Former special counsel Robert Mueller, accompanied by his top aide in the investigation Aaron Zebley (right), testifies July 24 before the House Intelligence Committee hearing on his report on Russian election interference on Capitol Hill.

WASHINGTON — Lawyers for House Democrats are urging a judge to release secret grand jury testimony from special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation as Congress conducts an impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.

Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell heard arguments Tuesday but did not immediately rule on the request.

Doug Letter, a lawyer for the House, said the materials are needed to investigate what Trump knew about Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.

The argument turns in part on whether the House is conducting a formal impeachment inquiry and whether it counts as a “judicial proceeding.” While grand jury transcripts are secret, one exception allows them to be shared for “judicial proceedings.”

Republicans argue that impeachment is not under way until a formal House vote. Democrats say no vote is necessary.

Categories: Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.