In ‘substantive’ call, Pat Toomey tells Trump to ‘seize an opportunity’ on gun background checks |
Politics Election

In ‘substantive’ call, Pat Toomey tells Trump to ‘seize an opportunity’ on gun background checks

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Lehigh Valley, speaks during a television news interview on Capitol Hill in Washington.

For nearly 40 minutes Wednesday, U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey and two of his colleagues from across the aisle huddled around a phone, fielding what they described as thoughtful questions from President Donald Trump about hammering out a bill to expand gun background checks.

Afterward, the Pennsylvania Republican once again told reporters that the president was engaged and interested in doing something on the issue — but still has not endorsed Toomey’s proposal to expand background checks to all commercial gun purchases or any other ideas that have been put forward since a pair of mass shooting in early August.

That could change in the next day or so. Toomey’s Democratic colleagues — U.S. Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Chris Murphy of Connecticut — said they expect to hear from the White House as soon as Thursday on whether Trump is willing to endorse any of the proposals under discussion.

“I do think we’re getting to the witching hour,” Murphy said. “I think we will know soon, within the next day or two, if the White House is willing to put a substantive background check bill on the table.”

Toomey was more circumspect about the timing, saying Thursday’s proposed deadline for a decision had not been “carved in stone.”

Trump told reporters after the phone call that he had more meetings scheduled this evening on gun-control legislation, and that he’d be speaking to the senators again tomorrow.

“We’re going to take a look at a lot of different things and we’ll be reporting back in a fairly short period of time,” Trump said, according to a White House pool report. “There’s a lot of things under discussion.”

Toomey’s message to the president was that it’s time to take action, and that the proposal he crafted in 2013 with Manchin — which would ensure that those buying guns commercially over the internet or at gun shows would be subject to background checks — would offer the best opportunity for success.

“There are any number of tweaks that would be possible, there would be adjustments,” Toomey said. “That could be worked out.”

Democratic lawmakers have been urging a vote on a gun control proposal, pointing specifically to the universal background check bill that already passed the House. That proposal is broader than Toomey’s proposal.

The top Republican in the Senate, Mitch McConnell, has said he won’t bring up any gun-control proposals unless the measures have backing from the president.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.