Jimmy Carter on Russia meddling: ‘Trump didn’t actually win the election’ | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

Jimmy Carter on Russia meddling: ‘Trump didn’t actually win the election’

The Washington Post
1350983_web1_AP19133718093897
AP
Former president Jimmy Carter, seen here in 2018, said Friday that he believes a full investigation of the 2016 election would show that President Donald Trump prevailed because of Russian interference on his behalf and otherwise would not be in office.

Former president Jimmy Carter said Friday that he believes a full investigation of the 2016 election would show that President Donald Trump prevailed because of Russian interference on his behalf and otherwise would not be in office.

“There’s no doubt that the Russians did interfere in the election, and I think the interference, although not yet quantified, if fully investigated would show that Trump didn’t actually win the election in 2016,” Carter said. “He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.”

His made his comments during a panel discussion at conference in Leesburg,Virginia, sponsored by the Carter Center, a nonprofit organization he founded in 1982 that focuses on human rights.

Pressed by historian Jon Meacham, who moderated the discussion, on whether he considers Trump to be “an illegitimate president,” Carter repled: “Based on what I just said, which I can’t retract.”

The report by special counsel Robert Mueller concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 election “in sweeping and systematic fashion” to the benefit of Trump and detriment of Democrat Hillary Clinton. But the report drew no conclusion about whether the interference changed the result.

In response to questions, Carter was also critical of Trump and his administration on other issues, including its treatment of migrant children at the U.S.-Mexico border.

“Everyday we send a disgraceful signal around the world, that this is what the present United States government stands for, and that is torture and kidnapping of little children,” Carter said.

He said called the tactics of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement “a disgrace to the United States.”

“I hope it will be soon be ended, maybe not until the 2020 elections, I’m not sure,” Carter added.

Carter was also critical of the Trump administration’s response to the slaying of Jamal Khashoggi, the Washington Post columnist who was dismembered by Saudi government agents in October at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.

Asked how his administration would have responded, Carter said he would pressed for greater accountability from the Saudi government.

“I believe we would have demanded a complete accounting about how high up the orders came from,” Carter said, adding that he believed the assassination could only have been carried out if those at the highest levels of government were aware of the plan.

A recently concluded U.N. investigation into Khashoggi’s death faulted the United States and other countries for not exerting enough pressure on Saudi Arabia despite “credible evidence” of the likelihood that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was involved in Khashoggi’s killing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.