Larry Kudlow chewed out by Trump for admitting tariffs hurt American consumers |
Politics Election

Larry Kudlow chewed out by Trump for admitting tariffs hurt American consumers

Bloomberg photo by Al Drago
Larry Kudlow, director of the U.S. National Economic Council, speaks to members of the media outside the West Wing of the White House in Washington, D.C., Aug. 16. Kudlow hosted a birthday party at his home over the weekend, and Peter Brimelow attended. Brimelow has been a promoter of white-identity politics over the past two decades.

Larry Kudlow is finding out the hard way that pleasing the Donald and telling the truth is a tough balancing act.

The White House economics czar reportedly got chewed out by President Trump for admitting that American consumers will pay the price for the White House’s tariff-happy trade war.

“Trump called Larry, and they had it out,” a White House official told the Washington Post. Two other sources improbably insisted the exchange was cordial.

Trump hired Kudlow, a former CNBC talking head, to be the public face of his economic policy.

So the mercurial commander-in-chief was not best pleased to hear that Kudlow contradicted Trump’s debunked claim that China pays the new tariffs slapped on everything from iPhones to washing machines.

Kudlow truthfully conceded the obvious fact that “both sides” suffer in a tariff tit-for-tat trade war.

So far, Kudlow has been fairly successful at winning positive headlines for Trump and avoiding any obvious blunders. Of course, it doesn’t hurt that unemployment is at record lows and the stock market is hitting new highs.

But Trump has quickly soured on aides whom he perceives as being less than 100 percent loyal to his line. So it might be time for Larry to start polishing up his resume.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.