McConnell: I don’t know why Jon Stewart is ‘all bent out of shape’ on 9/11 victims fund |
Politics Election

McConnell: I don’t know why Jon Stewart is ‘all bent out of shape’ on 9/11 victims fund

The Washington Post
Entertainer and activist Jon Stewart lends his support to firefighters, first responders and survivors of the September 11 terror attacks at a hearing by the House Judiciary Committee as it considers permanent authorization of the Victim Compensation Fund, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 11, 2019.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., responded Monday to comedian Jon Stewart’s criticism of his handling of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, saying that he didn’t know why Stewart was “all bent out of shape.”

McConnell’s comments, made in an interview with “Fox & Friends,” were made one day after Stewart blasted the Kentucky Republican’s leadership on the issue.

“I want to make it clear that this has never been dealt with compassionately by Senator McConnell,” Stewart said on “Fox News Sunday.” “He has always held out until the very last minute, and only then, under intense lobbying and public shaming, has he even deigned to move on it.”

Asked about Stewart’s criticism, McConnell argued Monday that “many things in Congress happen at the last minute.” He added that the fund, which provides compensation to first responders and others who are sick or dying from illnesses linked to their work at the 9/11 attack sites, will be fully funded.

“We have never failed to address this issue, and we will address it again,” McConnell said. “I don’t know why he’s all bent out of shape, but we will take care of the 9/11 victims compensation fund.”

Last week, the House Judiciary Committee voted unanimously in favor of extending the fund, which is currently set to stop taking claims in December 2020. The measure is expected to pass the House, although its fate in the Senate remains unclear; Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said last week that he was “begging” McConnell to bring the legislation to the floor “immediately after it passes the House.”

Schumer renewed his call Monday, addressing McConnell in a tweet.

“I’ll tell you why,” Schumer said in response to McConnell questioning why Stewart was “all bent out of shape.” “Because 9/11 victims are getting sicker, and the last time this bill came up you delayed.”

The House panel’s vote came one day after Stewart, the former host of “The Daily Show,” excoriated members of Congress at a hearing on the legislation.

“As I sit here today, I can’t help but think what an incredible metaphor this room is for the entire process that getting health care and benefits for 9/11 first responders has come to,” Stewart told a Judiciary subcommittee. “Behind me, a filled room of 9/11 first responders, and in front of me, a nearly empty Congress.”

McConnell responded Monday that committee and subcommittee hearings are frequently empty “because members have a lot of things going on at the same time.”

“It sounds to me like he’s looking for some way to take offense,” he said of Stewart. “There’s no way we won’t address this problem appropriately. We have in the past. We will again in the future.”

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.