ShareThis Page
Moulton highlights military service in presidential bid |

Moulton highlights military service in presidential bid

The Washington Post
Patrick T. Fallon | Bloomberg News
Rep. Seth Moulton, D-Mass., has received criticism over his opposition to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., becoming speaker of the House.

Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts launched a bid Monday for the Democratic nomination for president, becoming the 19th candidate in the most crowded primary in the party’s modern history.

“I’m running because I’m a patriot, because I believe in this country and because I’ve never wanted to sit on the sidelines when it comes to serving us,” Moulton said in an interview on ABC’s “Good Morning America” hours after posting an announcement video on his website that highlighted his military service.

Moulton, 40, a former Marine Corps captain who served in the Iraq War, was first elected in 2014 after ousting a scandal-plagued Democratic incumbent. He is the sixth current or recent member of the House to enter the Democratic contest and one of three veterans seeking the nomination. Like Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii, and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg, he has touted that experience as a reason he can defeat President Trump.

During his interview on ABC, he called Trump “the most divisive president in American history” and said he would stand apart from others in the Democratic field because he is “going to talk about patriotism, about security, about service.”

“These are issues that for too long Democrats have ceded to Republicans, and we’ve got to stop that,” Moulton said.

Moulton planned on heading to New Hampshire, the first presidential primary state, on Tuesday.

“We’ve never had a more reckless commander in chief,” Moulton said last month during his listening tour of the first four primary states. “Veterans aren’t going to let themselves be defined by a draft dodger.”

Moulton is also the second House member to mount a presidential bid after waging an effort to replace Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., as House speaker. Like Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, who entered the race earlier this month, Moulton campaigned for multiple House candidates last cycle while calling for fresh leadership. And like Ryan, Moulton eventually voted to give the gavel back to Pelosi, but only after some negotiations over the party’s rules.

“We have a speaker who’s doing a great job with the president,” Moulton told The Washington Post last month. “We have an agreement on term limits that’s going to give this new generation of leaders a voice. Honestly, in some ways, that’s better than if we just had three new leaders in the House.”

While Moulton made some allies around the country in 2018 — his Serve America PAC raised $4.3 million and helped elect 21 candidates — he has not been strongly identified with moderates or the insurgent left wing.

During his appearance on ABC, he sought to put some distance between himself and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who self-identifies as a democratic socialist.

“I’m not a socialist; I’m a Democrat. I want to make that clear,” Moulton said.

As Moulton considered a run, his political team conducted focus groups in New Hampshire and South Carolina that found Democratic voters prizing an electable candidate above all other factors – and not wedded to older, better-known candidates. They were warm, his team said, to the idea of supporting a candidate from a younger generation who could combat the president’s national security record.

Moulton has echoed some of the party’s left-wing activists in calling for the end of the electoral college and suggesting that “court-packing” might be necessary to combat conservative gains in the judicial branch. At the same time, he has criticized the concept of Medicare-for-all, citing his own frustrations with the Veterans Affairs health care system to say that single-payer health care comes with real downsides.

“Maybe some of these folks should join me the next time I go in for surgery,” Moulton said of single-payer advocates in a March interview with The Post.

The Massachusetts congressman also separates himself from the two veterans already in the race with his focus on foreign policy. Gabbard, who endorsed Sanders for president in 2016, has called for an end to “wasteful regime-change wars,” while Buttigieg has talked little about foreign policy. Moulton, who held multiple roundtables with veterans as he explored his 2020 bid, has called for modernizing America’s military posture by prioritizing cyber and autonomous weapons instead of large military equipment.

“Russia and China have an inherent advantage over us by being more budget-restrained and less politically constrained,” he said in a February speech at the Brookings Institution. “They don’t have the luxury of trying to compete with our big, expensive legacy weapons systems, so they have to develop the smaller, cheaper next-generation weapons.”

Moulton begins this bid as an underdog, though he often notes that he began his 2014 House run in a similar position. In 2018, he raised $2.4 million to defeat a Republican candidate who put up only token opposition; if he were to switch back from the presidential race to run for another House term, he would have until June 2020 to decide.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.