Republican group apologizes for mocking congresswomen as ‘Jihad Squad’ |
Politics Election

Republican group apologizes for mocking congresswomen as ‘Jihad Squad’

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., speaks as, from left, Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., and Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., listen during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, July 15, 2019.

WASHINGTON — Republican Party leaders in Illinois apologized over the weekend for a Facebook post that smeared the four congresswomen at the center of the President Trump’s recent verbal attacks as the “Jihad Squad.”

An image shared by the Republican County Chairmen’s Association of Illinois on Friday depicts the first-term lawmakers, all women of color, as gun-toting vigilantes in a mock movie poster. In doctored images, Rep. Ayanna S. Pressley aims a handgun at the viewer while Rep. Rashida Tlaib contorts her face in a scream. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wears a red dress that resembles a Bond movie costume, an explosion burning at her feet. Rep. Ilhan Omar hovers over the trio, a firearm at her side.

“POLITICAL JIHAD IS THEIR GAME,” the tagline reads next to the association’s logo.

The state Republican group deleted the image after facing questions from the Chicago Tribune, which first reported the story. The organization apologized in a statement Sunday night.

“I condemn this unauthorized posting and it has been deleted. I am sorry if anyone who saw the image was offended by the contents,” Mark Shaw, president of the chairmen’s association, said in a statement.

The association plans to review its “multi-stage” internal review process for the page’s content, he said.

The chairman of the Illinois Republican Party, Tim Schneider, acknowledged the social media post broadcast “bigoted rhetoric” and issued a statement to the Tribune condemning it.

“The recent social media post coming from the IRCCA does not reflect my values or the Illinois Republican Party’s values,” Schneider said. “I urge everyone who opposes them to keep the rhetoric focused on policy and ideology.”

Scorn for post comes amid fallout from Trump’s racist call for four first-term progressive members of Congress to “go back” to “the crime infested countries from which they came,” which Republicans in the House voted against condemning last week.

The “Jihad Squad” attacks echoes a conspiracy theory that has been amplified by Trump: The president has repeatedly accused Omar of sympathizing with terrorists, a gross distortion of a 2013 interview and Islamophobic rhetoric used to tar other high-profile Muslim politicians.

As Republicans have begun formulating their strategy for the 2020 elections, they have already frequently invoked the names and images of the four freshman lawmakers.

GOP operatives expect the Democratic congresswomen will remain a key focus of Trump’s reelection strategy, at least until the party formally picks a presidential nominee next summer. In down-ballot races, the women have already been the focus of television ads and campaigns by the National Republican Congressional Campaign Committee and some Republican candidates.

Republicans in Congress scrambled last week to reframe the president’s opposition to the “Squad” as a statement about their policy agenda, including the Green New Deal, a plan to rapidly decarbonize the economy, and “Medicare for All,” which would scrap private insurance companies, not their non-white ancestry.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.