Republican Will Hurd criticizes Trump for sharing heavily edited video of Pelosi |
Politics Election

Republican Will Hurd criticizes Trump for sharing heavily edited video of Pelosi

The Washington Post
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., greets supporters after speaking at a panel discussion at Delaware County Community College, Friday, May 24, 2019, in Media, Pa.

A Republican lawmaker said Sunday that he is concerned about President Trump’s sharing of a heavily edited video that spliced together several verbal pauses by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Rep. Will Hurd, R-Texas, said that by sharing the video, Trump has escalated the debate over disinformation, which is “something that gets at the heart of our democracy.”

“You shouldn’t disseminate information that you know is ultimately doctored,” Hurd said when asked about the video during an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Trump shared the video Thursday night on Twitter, ratcheting up tensions in his spat with Pelosi amid accusations from Democrats that the White House is stonewalling congressional investigations into the president’s personal finances, businesses and other matters.

“PELOSI STAMMERS THROUGH NEWS CONFERENCE,” Trump wrote in his tweet, quoting the chyron from Fox Business Network, which aired the video Thursday night on “Lou Dobbs Tonight.”

In a response on Twitter on Thursday night, Pelosi said Trump was “distracting from House Democrats’ great accomplishments #ForThePeople, from his cover-ups, and unpopularity.”

Trump’s tweet came on the same day that The Washington Post reported on the rapid spread of other distorted videos of Pelosi that have been altered to make her sound as if she is drunkenly slurring her words.

While none of the clips were “deepfakes” — realistic-looking fake videos crafted with the help of artificial-intelligence technology — Hurd said Sunday that they were nonetheless concerning. He added that lawmakers need to do a better of job of battling deepfakes and other disinformation as technology quickly transforms the U.S. political landscape.

“There’s a lot of things that’s concerning with that video of Speaker Pelosi, and it was just slowed down to make it seem like she was having a hard time speaking,” Hurd said. “This wasn’t even a deepfake… . In this case, at least we had the original to compare the two and recognize that it was doctored.”

Hurd predicted that “within months, we’re going to be able to see this deepfake technology continue to grow.”

“We’re not prepared,” he said. “We have old laws to decide how you handle disinformation. You have leaders that don’t understand how this technology can be used in the future. … We can’t be promoting this stuff, and if you can’t tell the difference between a doctored piece of information and not, that’s troubling as well.”

Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney, tweeted a link to one of the altered videos of Pelosi last week with the note, “What is wrong with Nancy Pelosi? Her speech pattern is bizarre.” The tweet was later deleted.

Giuliani later said in a text message that he deleted the tweet because someone had a raised a question about it “and since I wasn’t sure I deleted it.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.