Republicans attack Richard Burr over decision to subpoena Trump Jr. |
Politics Election

Republicans attack Richard Burr over decision to subpoena Trump Jr.

Tribune News Service
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., speaks during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on April 12, 2018.

WASHINGTON — Just days after the Senate’s top Republican declared “case closed” on the Trump campaign’s involvement with Russian meddling in the 2016 election, a GOP-led Senate committee investigating the issue subpoenaed the president’s son, setting off howls from Republicans aimed at Sen. Richard Burr.

Burr, a North Carolina Republican in his third term in the Senate, has largely been able to shield the Senate Intelligence Committee from partisan bickering. But Republicans teed off on Burr for the decision to subpoena Donald Trump Jr. — after the release of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report and after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s declaration on the Senate floor.

“Apparently the Republican chair of the Senate Intel Committee didn’t get the memo from the Majority Leader that this case was closed,” Sen. Rand Paul, a Kentucky Republican, wrote on Twitter, linking to the Axios story breaking news of the subpoena.

“I think it’s over. It’s a moot point. It’s overkill and it’s sort of malicious to bring the president’s family in here, subject them to more interviews,” Paul said Thursday.

President Trump said he was surprised to see his son subpoenaed.

“My son’s a very good person, works very hard,” Trump said Thursday at the White House. “The last thing he needs is Washington, D.C. — he would rather not ever be involved.”

McConnell, from Kentucky, insisted Tuesday that the release of the Mueller report means that it’s “case closed” for the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. He called for an end to “this ‘Groundhog Day’ spectacle, stop endlessly re-litigating a 2 1/2-year-old election result, and move forward for the American people.”

McConnell said of Burr’s investigation only that the “upcoming report from the Select Committee on Intelligence” would help the Senate determine what it needs to do for election security.

The Associated Press reported that the intelligence committee is interested in discussing Trump Jr.’s 2017 testimony before the committee, which has been called into question by testimony by Michael Cohen, the president’s former lawyer. The questions could be about Trump Jr.’s involvement in the Trump Tower project in Moscow, as well as a June 2016 meeting with Russians at Trump Tower.

Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., called the subpoena “beyond inappropriate.”

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., did not mention his colleague by name, but expressed his displeasure with extending the investigation Thursday in a tweet. He noted Trump Jr. testified for 27 hours before Congress and said the Mueller report cleared him.

“Case closed! … Let’s move on and get to work on the real issues facing America,” said Tillis, who is facing a Republican challenger in his 2020 reelection bid.

Burr, 63, said during his 2016 reelection campaign that he is not running again in 2022. He has worked to keep his committee’s investigation free from the drama that surrounded the House’s investigation and even outside of the partisan fight that emerged around the Mueller report. And that approach has largely worked.

In an interview with CBS in February, one the few times he’s spoken at length about the investigation, Burr said the committee had not turned up evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

“We’ll be judged at the end of this on the product that we produce,” Burr told CBS. “We’ll also be judged on the process that we chose. … None of us ever anticipated that this would be two years.”

Sen. Roy Blunt, a Missouri Republican and a member of the intelligence committee, backed Burr. He said Trump Jr. should comply with the subpoena and appear before the committee.

“Just trying to be sure everybody is asked all the questions they need to be asked before we do a final report,” Blunt said, adding that he expects the committee to issue most of its report before July 4 and the final “most interesting” part before the end of August.

Blunt, a member of McConnell’s leadership team, said he does not expect the committee to reach different conclusions than Mueller did, but he said the committee has “more specifics about the kinds of things the Russians were doing and continue to do.” He said Burr’s job as chairman is “a challenging assignment every day. It just happens that today the challenge is a little more public.”

President Trump has claimed complete exoneration from the Mueller report, which concluded there was no collusion between his campaign and Russians aiming to influence the election between him and Democrat Hillary Clinton. The report did not make a judgment on obstruction of justice charges, but Attorney General William Barr cleared Trump.

Republicans have been eager to move on — and were more than ready to hit the Senate committee for keeping it in the news.

“If you read the Mueller report there are two questions,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., told reporters Thursday. “Was there collusion? The answer is no. Was there obstruction? The answer is no. Nothing’s gonna change that outcome. So the country needs to move forward.”

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.