Sen. Bob Casey cites Tree of Life massacre as he calls for gun bills vote |
Politics Election

Sen. Bob Casey cites Tree of Life massacre as he calls for gun bills vote

Deb Erdley

Calling gun violence a uniquely American problem and citing last year’s massacre of worshippers inside a Pittsburgh synagogue, U.S. Bob Casey, D-Scranton, took to the floor of the Senate in an emotional 25 minute speech, imploring Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to call for a vote on a federal gun background check bill that passed the House 200 days ago.

Casey joined other Senate Democrats who held the floor late into the night Tuesday in an effort to highlight calls for “commonsense gun reforms.”

While pressure for action on gun violence appeared to be building after mass shootings in Texas and Ohio last month, McConnell has said he will not bring a bill to the floor for a vote without President Donald Trump’s support.

Reading off the names of those murdered at Tree of Life and holding up pictures of children murdered six years earlier in a mass shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, Casey said it is past time for action on bills calling for expanded background checks and extreme risk protection orders.

“Why should we wait for the president to give us the high sign about what he will sign into law? This chamber should not wait for any other official. We should debate and vote and see where things are. The American people will sort it out after we vote, and they will know who is on the record voting which way,” Casey said.

The renewed push for expanded federal background checks comes as lawmakers in Harrisburg weigh a package of proposals to increase gun regulations in Pennsylvania.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

U.S. Sen. Bob Casey
Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.