Trump, in California, says cities ‘destroy themselves’ with homelessness |
Politics Election

Trump, in California, says cities ‘destroy themselves’ with homelessness

President Donald Trump arrives at Los Angeles International Airport to attend a fundraiser, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2019, in Los Angeles.
Demonstrators stand along the motorcade route of President Donald Trump as he drives to a fundraiser, Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2019, in Portola Valley, Calif.

PALO ALTO, Calif. — President Donald Trump arrived in California late Tuesday morning amid growing questions over his administration’s plans to get involved in the state’s homelessness crisis.

After a visit to the San Francisco Bay Area, the president landed at Los Angeles International Airport.

Trump is in the state for a two-day visit, with stops for fundraising in Palo Alto, Beverly Hills and San Diego. The fundraisers are expected to bring in $15 million and will benefit Trump Victory, a joint fundraising committee composed of the Trump campaign and the Republican National Committee.

In recent months, Trump has used the issue of homelessness to bash the deep-blue state in advance of the 2020 election. While aboard Air Force One on Tuesday, he addressed the issue with reporters, saying that he is considering the creation of an “individual task force” as a possible solution to homelessness, without providing more details.

“We can’t let Los Angeles, San Francisco and numerous other cities destroy themselves by allowing what’s happening,” he said, adding that the homelessness crisis is prompting residents of those cities to leave the country. “They can’t believe what’s happening.”

“We have people living in our … best highways, our best streets, our best entrances to buildings … where people in those buildings pay tremendous taxes, where they went to those locations because of the prestige,” he said. “In many cases, they came from other countries and they moved to Los Angeles or they moved to San Francisco because of the prestige of the city, and all of a sudden they have tents. Hundreds and hundreds of tents and people living at the entrance to their office building. And they want to leave. And the people of San Francisco are fed up, and the people of Los Angeles are fed up.”

The president said that he plans to discuss the topic further with Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, who is joined him Tuesday in the San Francisco Bay Area and then in L.A.

According to Los Angeles Police Department Chief Michel Moore, he and Carson will meet Wednesday to discuss housing issues, including homelessness. The meeting was requested by Carson.

California officials have largely been wary of the Trump administration’s intentions, concerned that the president wants to use homelessness and urban ills as a wedge for the 2020 campaign. But they have said that they are willing to work with Trump.

In a letter issued Monday and signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and mayors and county supervisors from across the state, state officials asked for 50,000 more vouchers that would aid people most affected by California’s housing crisis. They also urged the Trump administration to provide incentives to landlords to accept vouchers.

“That’s a pretty remarkable opportunity, if they’re sincere in their desires,” Newsom said at a news conference. “If they’re insincere and this is, God forbid, about something else — politics, not good policy — then they’ll reject it outright. I hope that’s not the case.”

Last week, officials from Trump’s administration spent several days in Los Angeles meeting with city and county officials and homeless advocates. To the dismay of some local officials, the administration has said little publicly about any plans. Some speculate that the goal is to clear homeless encampments by moving people into government-run shelters on federal land.

On Monday, the White House floated a new goal: deregulation of the housing market to increase the supply of apartments, condominiums and homes.

Last week, representatives from the Department of Justice discussed possible “workarounds” with Los Angeles law enforcement union officials to deal with court settlements, rulings and lawsuits that have limited the way the LAPD can carry out enforcement efforts at encampments.

While Trump addressed homelessness in Air Force One, Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke of Texas campaigned on skid row, denouncing reports that the president is considering a plan to sweep people off the streets of Los Angeles and force them into shelters in warehouses.

The former El Paso congressman met with advocates at the Downtown Women’s Center, where he vowed to strengthen federal efforts to combat homelessness.

O’Rourke said the path out of homelessness “cannot be using the police to sweep people off of the streets, to warehouse people out of sight and out of mind.”

Of California’s roughly 130,000 homeless people, some 90,000 were unsheltered as of last year. Within the city of Los Angeles, the number jumped in 2019 to more than 36,000, a 16% increase. In the county, the number is just shy of 59,000 — a 12% bump over last year.

For Trump, he has indicated in interviews that scenes of homeless people who appear to be mentally ill and walking around mounds of trash in cities are unacceptable. In fact, he said, they’re “inappropriate.”

During a speech at a Republican conference in Baltimore on Thursday, Trump said his administration has given “notice” to California, though it was unclear what that “notice” was.

“Clean it up,” he said. “You’ve got to do something. You can’t have it. These are our great American cities and they’re an embarrassment.”

In preparation for Trump’s arrival, protesters across the state mobilized Tuesday.

In the San Francisco Bay Area, roughly 200 protesters with the Backbone Campaign, Raging Grannies and Vigil for Democracy gathered at Rossotti Field in Portola Valley — a short distance from the Palo Alto mansion where the fundraising event was being held. The mansion, the former home of Scott McNealy, the co-founder of Sun Microsystems, is on the market for $96 million.

Police cars and motorcycles from the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Department and from cities throughout the county lined Alpine Drive from Interstate 280. Along the way, some protesters held signs calling for Trump’s impeachment as shuttle vans filled with donors rolled by.

Teslas, Mercedes and hybrid cars passed by, with drivers mostly beeping their horns in support. One cyclist yelled slurs at the protesters.

Curious neighbors also joined the raucous gathering. Among them, Dene Rowell, who lives near the mansion, stopped by to check out the hubbub. She said she had seen tents erected there since the end of last week. She assumed it was for a wedding — until she saw the Secret Service agents descend on the propery.

“Then I put two and two together,” Rowell said.

Meghan Melaney, a “Raging Granny” from Menlo Park, said she was there to stand up for “ethical government.”

Her fellow Granny, Ruth Robertson of Palo Alto, brought a bag filled with extra granny hats.

“People show up and want to join,” she said. “I come prepared.”

A balloon resembling an infant-like Trump in diapers floated above the protesters. On Saturday, the Federal Aviation Administration issued a VIP flight restriction notice, prohibiting planes, gliders, parachute operations, hang gliding, banner towing and “balloon operations” in a 32-mile radius around Palo Alto. The balloon was flown despite the notice.

William Johnson, of Backbone Campaign, which brought the balloon, said he didn’t see any safety concerns with the balloon. The group is from Vashon, Wash.

“We’re kind of wondering if they’re targeting us,” said Johnson of the FAA restriction.

Alan Marling, a San Francisco-based activist helped organize another event at the Embarcadero in San Francisco, said protesters would fly their balloons despite the restrictions. Indeed, a balloon of a chicken sporting Trump-like hair appeared there Tuesday afternoon.

“If Donald Trump spends taxpayer money” to stop activists from flying baby Trump balloons, then “that just proves he is one,” Marling said.

A copy of the invitation for the Palo Alto event, which is being organized by the Republican National Committee, shows ticket prices ranging from $1,000 to $100,000. Big spenders will get a photo opportunity with the president, as well as “premiere seating” for the luncheon. A $35,500 donation provides only “preferred seating.” The local organizer is not named.

And in Los Angeles, where Trump is slated to spend the night, the Revolution Club will protest Trump’s visit to Beverly Hills, where he is scheduled to attend a roundtable with supporters and a fundraising committee dinner at the home of real estate developer and Republican donor Geoff Palmer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.