Trump warns of ‘long jail sentences’ for those ‘spying’ on his 2016 campaign |
Politics Election

Trump warns of ‘long jail sentences’ for those ‘spying’ on his 2016 campaign

The Washington Post
President Donald Trump waves as he concludes his speech about modernizing the immigration system in the Rose Garden of the White House, Thursday, May 16, 2019, in Washington.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump warned Friday of the possibility of “long jail sentences” for law-enforcement and intelligence officials involved in the early stages of the investigation into possible coordination between Russia and members of his 2016 campaign.

“My Campaign for President was conclusively spied on,” Trump claimed in a morning tweet. “Nothing like this has ever happened in American Politics. A really bad situation. TREASON means long jail sentences, and this was TREASON!”

His claims come as Attorney General William Barr has taken steps to review the origins of the Russia probe, including the appointment of a senior prosecutor to examine the roles of the FBI and the CIA.

Trump has long claimed that his campaign was subject to illegal surveillance and has used the term “spying” to characterize what he says took place. In recent congressional testimony, Barr said “spying” did occur, but he has not said the surveillance was unjustified.

At a Senate hearing earlier this month, FBI Director Christopher Wray — also a Trump appointee — said he had not seen any evidence that illegal surveillance was conducted on individuals associated with Trump’s campaign. He also said “spying” was not a term he would use. Trump subsequently called Wray’s testimony “ridiculous.”

Trump has stepped up his calls to investigate the investigators of Russian election interference in the wake of the release of the report of special counsel Robert Mueller.

Mueller’s report concluded that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election “in sweeping and systematic fashion.”

The interference included both a social media campaign that favored Trump and disparaged Democrat Hillary Clinton, and the hacking of computers maintained by allies of Clinton and the subsequent releases of stolen documents.

The report did not find sufficient evidence to bring charges of criminal conspiracy with Russia against Trump or anyone associated with his campaign. It did not offer a conclusion on whether Trump obstructed justice.

Barr later concluded that there was not sufficient evidence for obstruction of justice, but House Democrats are continuing to pursue that issue.

Republicans have accused FBI leaders of using flimsy or false claims to get court surveillance orders on former Trump adviser Carter Page in 2016 and 2017. They have also accused senior FBI officials of political bias against Trump. Current and former FBI officials have defended the bureau’s actions, saying they were obligated to investigate allegations of wrongdoing.

In his tweets, Trump cited a Fox News poll released Thursday that found that 58 percent of voters think it is “at least somewhat likely the FBI broke the law” when it first started investigating the Trump campaign.

Trump overstated the finding, writing that “58% of people say that the FBI broke the law in investigating Donald J. Trump.”

Trump has long expressed ire toward former FBI director James Comey, whom he fired amid the Russia probe in 2017.

In another tweet on Friday, Trump wrote, “What happened is that Donald Trump won. Down goes Comey.” He attributed the quote to Fox News’s morning program “Fox & Friends.”

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.