Trump’s travel to Mar-a-Lago alone likely cost taxpayers more than $64 million |
Politics Election

Trump’s travel to Mar-a-Lago alone likely cost taxpayers more than $64 million

President Trump greets the Florida Atlantic University Marching Band cheerleaders at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach, Fla., Sunday, Feb. 3, 2019, upon arrival for a Super Bowl party.

One of the ongoing questions about the administration of President Trump has an answer – at least, in part.

Since his first month in office, with his first weekend forays to his private retreat in Florida — Mar-a-Lago — questions have been raised about the cost of those trips. This isn’t simple to figure out, given that the total includes costs incurred by various government agencies as well as costs associated with Trump’s Secret Service protection. While estimates of the cost existed, it would require a great deal of information from across the government to come up with an accurate total.

The Government Accountability Office gathered that information. On Tuesday, it released a report looking only at Trump’s first four trips to Mar-a-Lago, on Feb. 3-6, Feb. 10-12, Feb. 17-20 and March 3-5, 2017.

The total? Just under $14 million, for an average cost of $3.4 million per trip. That total includes about $8.5 million spent by the Department of Defense and $5 million by the Department of Homeland Security. It also includes about $60,000 paid directly to Mar-a-Lago itself, $24,000 of which was for lodging for Defense Department personnel and $36,000 for operational space used by DHS.

The immediate question, of course, is how those costs extrapolate to all of Trump’s visits. This invariably leads to some apples-oranges problems, but we can make some reasonable estimates.

We know, from our having tracked his trips over time, that Trump has visited Mar-a-Lago on 19 separate occasions as president, spanning 51 nights.

Some of those trips, as shown above, were longer than others. The GAO report notes, however, that much of the costs of the trips were incurred by the air travel to and from Palm Beach, Fla., including transporting people and material needed to support the president while there. (About $7.4 million of the total was spent by the Air Mobility Command and 89th Air Wing.) If we, therefore, assume a blanket average of $3.4 million per trip, regardless of duration, the total the government has spent on Trump’s trips to the resort tops $64 million.

We can probably assume that the money spent at Mar-a-Lago itself was incurred on a nightly basis, given that it deals with hotel rooms and operational space. If that’s the case, the government has likely spent nearly $370,000 at Mar-a-Lago itself since Trump was inaugurated to protect the president.

How does $64 million in costs stack up against other government spending? Well, Trump has complained on several occasions about the cost of the investigation being conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller, including in December.

While that figure is higher than the $25 million the probe is reported to cost, it’s clearly substantially lower than the amount that’s likely been spent on Trump’s trips to Palm Beach. Given that the Mueller probe has also likely paid for itself given the assets it has seized from Paul Manafort in particular, there’s not really any comparison.

Trump also canceled a joint military exercise with the government of South Korea last year, citing the cost of the exercise. That cost? About $14 million — the cost of those first four trips Trump took to Florida.

One of the more remarkable aspects of the new figures from the GAO is that the figure is significantly higher than some of the existing estimates of the cost of his trips, which were derived from analysis of a trip taken by President Barack Obama. That assessment, published in 2016, found that a trip Obama took to Florida and Chicago cost $3.6 million. Estimates for the cost of Trump’s trips based on the Obama analysis landed at $1 million a piece, less than a third the average cost of the four considered by the GAO.

Our estimate of $64 million above also errs on the low side, equating as it does the week-plus Trump spent at Mar-a-Lago in December 2017 with his three-day trip there in February that same year. What’s more, it excludes every other trip Trump has made to one of his own properties as president, including to his private club in Bedminster, N.J. and his frequent forays to his golf club in Sterling, Va.

The mystery of the costs of Trump’s travel lives on.

Philip Bump is a correspondent for The Washington Post based in New York. Before joining The Post in 2014, he led politics coverage for the Atlantic Wire.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.