ShareThis Page
Watchdog: GSA ignored emoluments in OKing Trump hotel lease |
Politics Election

Watchdog: GSA ignored emoluments in OKing Trump hotel lease

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The General Services Administration improperly “ignored” the U.S. Constitution’s emoluments provision outlawing foreign gifts when it green-lit President Trump’s management of his Washington, D.C., hotel after his 2016 election, the agency’s inspector general said Wednesday.

In a 47-page report, GSA watchdog Carol F. Ochoa concluded that the “president’s business interest” in the Trump International Hotel at the Old Post Office building site in Washington raised emoluments issues that “might cause a breach of lease.”

But GSA lawyers “chose not to address those issues,” Ochoa said in her report. “As a result, GSA foreclosed an opportunity for an early resolution of those issues” and left the lease “under a constitutional cloud.”

The inspector general’s report did not say whether Trump had violated the Constitution and did not recommend canceling the lease, but urged a legal review, which the GSA has promised.

“The agency agrees with the report’s single recommendation and will take action consistent with that recommendation,” GSA General Counsel Jack St. John wrote in response to the report.

Trump won rights to lease the federal government’s Old Post Office site in 2012 and opened it as a luxury hotel in October 2016. Though Trump gave up day-to-day management of the Trump Organization when he entered the White House in 2017, he held onto his corporate ownership and earnings, including the Washington hotel.

Almost immediately, the hotel just blocks from the White House became a magnet for lobbyists, interest groups and foreign officials looking to curry favor with the newly elected president. The Kuwaiti and Philippine embassies have thrown parties there, and a public relations firm working for Saudi Arabia spent nearly $270,000 on food and rooms.

Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the new Democratic chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said the inspector general’s report was “devastating” and “proof” that Trump should have divested from his business before assuming office.

Trump is also being sued by attorney generals for Maryland and the District of Columbia who contend that the earnings Trump receives from the Washington hotel violate the emoluments provision. The case is now before a federal appeals court. Two other federal lawsuits also target Trump on the basis of the emoluments clause.

It was not clear from the GSA’s response to the report how the agency would proceed if its legal review finds that Trump’s lease violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause, which bans gifts to federal officials from foreign governments and U.S. state governments. St. John, the GSA general counsel, said the agency “will take action” consistent with the inspector general’s recommendation about the lease “in the future.”

Trump Organization officials did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press. The White House referred questions to a GSA spokeswoman, who did not go beyond St. John’s response.

In his letter to Ochoa, St. John emphasized that the report “found no undue influence, pressure, or unwarranted involvement of any kind by anyone, including the Executive Office of the President.”

But the inspector general noted that soon after Trump’s inauguration in January 2017, GSA officials met with the president’s two adult sons, Don Jr. and Eric, and “strongly encouraged” that their father divest his ownership of the hotel. One of the officials told the investigators that he did not have leverage to force the president to divest and the issue remained unresolved.

The next month, GSA asked the Trump Organization for its own analysis of the hotel lease, specifically a section that would prevent elected officials from being allowed to be a party to the terms of the lease. According to the inspector general, the Trump Organization argued that the section was not a problem because Trump had agreed to the lease before he was elected.

Last week, federal rangers opened up the Old Post Office site inside the hotel despite the 25-day government shutdown that closed other national park sites in Washington and across the country. The GSA said the decision to keep the post office site open was “unrelated to the facility’s tenant.”

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.