White House budget official: Trump was personally ‘directing’ freeze on U.S. military aid to Ukraine | TribLIVE.com
Politics Election

White House budget official: Trump was personally ‘directing’ freeze on U.S. military aid to Ukraine

1995330_web1_AP19320593128295
AP
Mark Sandy, a career employee in the White House Office of Management and Budget, arrives at the Capitol to testify in the House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry about President Donald Trump’s effort to tie military aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents, in Washington, Saturday, Nov. 16, 2019.

A career official in the White House budget office told impeachment investigators earlier this month that President Donald Trump was personally “directing” the alleged quid pro quo freeze on nearly $400 million in U.S. military aid to Ukraine, according to a transcript of his closed-door deposition released Tuesday.

Mark Sandy, a deputy associate director for national security programs, testified that his office received an email from a top aide to chief of staff Mick Mulvaney on July 12 saying that the administration should start preparing to put a hold on $391 million in assistance to Ukraine.

Asked by an investigator to elaborate on the email, Sandy said it stated that “the president is directing a hold on military support funding for Ukraine,” according to the Nov. 16 interview transcript.

The aid was formally frozen on July 18 — seven days before Trump pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy over the phone to do him “a favor” by launching investigations of Joe Biden’s family and debunked right-wing claims about the 2016 election.

Sandy said he repeatedly inquired about the reason for the hold on the military cash, which Ukraine relies on to push back against Russian military aggression.

The budget official said he didn’t receive an answer until September, when he was told the cash was frozen because of concerns about other European countries not giving Ukraine enough assistance.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said the belated explanation reeked of cover-up.

“Given other testimony and the public admission by Mr. Mulvaney that the aid was held to pressure Ukraine to conduct the investigations desired by the president, this constitutes powerful evidence that this justification was concocted as an after-the-fact rationalization to justify the hold,” Schiff, D-Calif., said in a statement late Tuesday.

The Sandy deposition transcript was released along with that of Philip Reeker, a State Department official who was deposed in the inquiry on Oct. 3. Theirs were the last outstanding deposition transcripts from the impeachment inquiry that kicked off in late September.

Schiff released the last transcripts as his committee was working on its final report, which he expects to turn over to the House Judiciary Committee next week for consideration and potential drafting of articles of impeachment against Trump.

Categories: News | Politics Election
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.