ShareThis Page
Our Stories

State College marathon man running from weight woes

| Saturday, Feb. 20, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

Doug Schunk had just finished the Marine Corps Marathon in three hours and 45 minutes — a disappointing time for him.

As he hobbled through the post-race crowd, he began assessing his performance and assigning blame:

He had failed to eat right that weekend. He didn't get enough sleep. He hadn't done his homework on Washington, D.C., public transportation and had to rush to the starting line. And he was paying for his missteps with a time 15 minutes off his goal, plus legs that had started screaming at mile 20 and continued now even after he'd stopped running.

He found a massage booth and eased his lanky body onto the table. A massage therapist, a woman in her 20s, stretched his legs and asked how he'd done.

Schunk reluctantly repeated his time. “I'm kind of down on myself,” he said. “I thought I'd get 3:30.”

The therapist assured him that 3:45 was an excellent time. And as she worked on his legs, Schunk, 34, of State College decided she was right.

“Well, compared to where I was a few years ago, I guess I can't complain,” he said.

“Where were you a few years ago?” the young lady asked.

“330,” Schunk replied.

She stopped working on his aching muscles. A fellow marathoner — a man in his 40s on a table next to him — turned and stared at Schunk.

“Are you kidding me?” the man asked.

“No,” Schunk replied. “I was 330 pounds.”

“You weren't,” the stunned massage therapist said.

“I was,” Schunk said. “I had a problem.”

That conversation happened in October, with Schunk weighing in at his new normal of 190 pounds.

But five years and 140 pounds ago, he was so overweight that he became winded by climbing stairs and began sweating just thinking about exercise.

“I'd always been the husky, fat kid,” Schunk said. “At some point I just kind of embraced it. I thought, ‘Well, this is who I am.' ”

Not now.

The change started after his son was born in 2010. Schunk went for an annual checkup, and his doctor found that his cholesterol levels were off the charts. The doctor considered Schunk's family history — his dad had a pacemaker put in on his 40th birthday — and sat him down for a serious talk.

You need to make changes, the doctor said. Now.

The first 50 came off easily. His friends were doing a trendy P90X workout, so Schunk tried it, and it worked. For a while.

But he got stuck at 280 pounds. In 2012, he told himself that he could do better.

“That's when I discovered running,” Schunk said.

After tucking his son Matthew into bed, Schunk would slip out of the house for short jogs around the neighborhood, figuring it would help burn off some of the calories he consumed at dinner. The more he ran, the longer he could go. In time, he could run several miles without stopping.

“Then one day I went to the gym and realized that the T-shirt I brought was my wife's,” Schunk said. “She's 5 feet 3 inches, 110 pounds, maybe. But I held it up and thought, ‘Wait a minute — this might fit me.'

“It was a little snug, but it kind of fit. I said, ‘Huh. How about that.' ”

After a summer of running, Schunk, a high school chemistry teacher, returned to school — where teachers he had known for years failed to recognize him.

One student asked if he had a terminal disease. “I didn't know how to take that,” he said. “I guess as a compliment.”

He kept running, and the pounds kept dropping. In 2014, he ran his first half marathon, clocking a 1:56 in the Pittsburgh Marathon. He returned last year and ran a personal best 1:36 — a speedy pace of 7:21 per mile.

These days, he is training for the full Pittsburgh Marathon on May 1 and hoping to improve on his 3:45 time in Washington.

If he falls short, that's fine.

Schunk knows how far he's come. And if he ever needs to be reminded, he simply opens his bedroom closet and pulls out two pairs of pants that fit him five years ago.

“Forty-six waist,” he said, holding the comically oversized pants in front of his 34-inch waist. “Sometimes I look at myself and I really don't see the difference because it happened gradually. But then I hold up these pants and ...

“Yeah. I've done some serious work.”

Doug Schunk, 34, of State College  wore a pair of jeans with a 46-inch waist when he weighed 330 pounds. Today, he is 190 pounds and training to run the Pittsburgh Marathon.
Doug Schunk, 34, of State College wore a pair of jeans with a 46-inch waist when he weighed 330 pounds. Today, he is 190 pounds and training to run the Pittsburgh Marathon.
Doug Schunk gets in a training run months before the 2016 Pittsburgh Marathon. 'I've always been the husky, fat kid,' he said. 'At some point, I just kind of embraced it. I thought, 'Well, this is who I am.'' Schunk has lost 140 pounds since 2010.
Doug Schunk gets in a training run months before the 2016 Pittsburgh Marathon. 'I've always been the husky, fat kid,' he said. 'At some point, I just kind of embraced it. I thought, 'Well, this is who I am.'' Schunk has lost 140 pounds since 2010.
Doug Schunk, before and after. In 2010, he weighed 330 pounds. Today he is down to 190 pounds, thanks to eating healthy foods and running.
Doug Schunk, before and after. In 2010, he weighed 330 pounds. Today he is down to 190 pounds, thanks to eating healthy foods and running.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me