ShareThis Page

California University of Pennsylvania plans to furlough 7 administrators, managers

| Tuesday, Jan. 26, 2016, 11:00 p.m.

California University of Pennsylvania is furloughing seven administrators and managers in what officials called a routine workforce adjustment.

Cal U spokeswoman Christine Kindl said the layoffs, which were announced Jan. 5, are the result of a periodic workforce review by the school. She said no faculty positions are involved in the most recent round of layoffs.

The Washington County university has had its enrollment decline by 17 percent, slipping from 9,483 in 2011 to 7,854 this fall, as the pool of new high school graduates in Western Pennsylvania decreased.

Like the other 13 state-owned universities in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, Cal U has had to tap its reserves during the prolonged state budget stalemate.

Kindl would not link the furloughs specifically to those factors, but she conceded that financial resources and enrollment are always considerations in any workforce review.

“It's always difficult to make these decisions, but every business needs to review its staffing periodically and make sure you have a balance between what you have and what you need,” Kindl said.

The latest layoffs follow the elimination of 14 non-faculty positions at the school in the 2014-15 school year and six in 2012.

At least one of the pending layoffs has sparked some opposition. Students and graduates have taken to Facebook and Twitter to lobby the university to keep Kay Kutz, assistant director of the Cal U Women's Center, victim advocate and director of its End Violence Center.

“She participated in a lot of programs on campus. The End Violence Center does a lot of outreach and definitely had a big impact,” said Abby Lochran, a December graduate who is lending her support to the online protest.

Kutz could not be reached for comment.

Debra Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. She can be reached at 412-320-7996 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me