ShareThis Page
Police bust suspected meth lab in Indiana County | TribLIVE.com
Regional

Police bust suspected meth lab in Indiana County

Jacob Tierney
| Sunday, January 20, 2019 10:48 a.m
658662_web1_web-handcuffs_dark

State police busted a suspected meth lab in Ernest, Indiana County on Friday.

Investigators suspected that a home on Main Street was being used to make methamphetamine.

They went to the house around 5:30 p.m. Friday and got permission to search, finding “several items that were found to be consistent with the clandestine manufacturing of methamphetamine” in the basement and garage, according to a police report.

There were two juveniles living in the house, police said.

The Pennsylvania State Police Clandestine Laboratory Response Team collected the evidence.

Charges are pending against a 39-year-old Ernst man whose name was not immediately released.

The man will be identified once the charges are formally filed, police said.

The man will be charged with endangering the welfare of children, operating a methamphetamine laboratory, manufacture of methamphetamine with person under 18 years of age present, manufacturing a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of pseudoephedrine for methamphetamine manufacture.


Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, jtierney@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Soolseem.


Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, jtierney@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.