ShareThis Page
Tower of Voices named No. 8 Best New Attraction in USA Today vote |

Tower of Voices named No. 8 Best New Attraction in USA Today vote

Stephen Huba
| Monday, January 21, 2019 5:14 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Families of United Flight 93 and officials stand at the base of the Tower of Voices during the dedication ceremony at the Flight 93 National Memorial on Sept. 9, 2018.

The Tower of Voices at the Flight 93 National Memorial in Somerset County has been named the No. 8 Best New Attraction in the nation by USA Today’s

The Laurel Highlands memorial was selected from an initial list of 20 nominees, which was then pared down to 10 by popular vote. The Tower of Voices, dedicated Sept. 9, 2018, came in at No. 8.

The Tower of Voices is a 93-foot monument made of precast concrete and designed by Los Angeles-based Paul Murdoch Architects. It sits near the entrance to the Flight 93 Memorial off U.S. Route 30.

A distinguishing feature of the tower is the sound created by 40 wind chimes that hang from the inside of the structure.

The chimes, made from polished aluminum, represent the 40 victims of United Flight 93 as it crashed in a field near Shanksville on 9/11. Each one is cut and tooled to produce a certain musical note as wind flows through the tower.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Regional
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.