States looking to tackle college indebtedness in K-12 curricula | TribLIVE.com
Education

States looking to tackle college indebtedness in K-12 curricula

Deb Erdley
1359292_web1_WEB-graduate

As student debt approaches $1.6 trillion nationally, presidential candidates are test-driving a raft of proposals to deal with what many consider a major problem.

Everything from tuition-free public college to debt forgiveness was on the agenda when 20 Democratic presidential contenders took the debate stage last week.

They aren’t alone in grappling with this issue.

Colleges and even some states are trying new approaches. Some colleges are requiring financial literacy counseling to ensure students understand what they’re doing when they sign on the dotted lines. Others are pitching efforts to get students through college in four years, asking they take a set number of credits per semester in return for promises to underwrite any courses they need beyond eight semesters.

Now the Education Commission of the States reports a number of legislatures are getting into the game. Nothing new is popping up in Pennsylvania, but the Commission cited bills in Nevada, Oklahoma and Virginia that address the issue.

According to the Commission’s Ed Note blog, a bill in the Nevada general assembly requires financial literacy be included in school curricula, including everything from career options, scholarship options, financial aid and how to file the Free Application for Federal Student Aid or FAFSA. Oklahoma lawmakers likewise would require instruction on understanding the FAFSA. Virginia lawmakers want to require financial literacy classes in both middle and high school grades, including information about the cost of college and the potential debt and earnings certain studies entail.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.