ShareThis Page
East Deer bridge near Sheetz finished, open to traffic | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

East Deer bridge near Sheetz finished, open to traffic

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Wednesday, January 23, 2019 12:54 p.m
668724_web1_vnd-eastdeerbridge-112818
The old bridge over Crawford Run on Freeport Road in East Deer. Flooding at the construction site where the bridge is being replaced has delayed the reopening of the bridge from December into January.
668724_web1_vnd-eastdeerbridge-012419
Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
The bridge over Crawford Run in East Deer fully opened to traffic on Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2019.

Work to replace the bridge over Crawford Run on Freeport Road in East Deer is finished and the new bridge is open to traffic, the contractor announced Wednesday.

Work on the bridge, near Sheetz, started in July. It was scheduled to be finished in December, but was delayed into January because of flooding at the construction site.

Traffic had been restricted during the work, with temporary signals controlling alternating traffic.

The bridge was replaced as part of the state’s Rapid Bridge Replacement Project, a public-private partnership between PennDOT and Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners. Work was done by Walsh II Construction of Pittsburgh.

The new crossing is longer and wider than the one it replaced.

It’s designed to last 100 years, Plenary Walsh said.

This bridge is one of the 558 bridges being replaced under the Rapid Bridge Replacement Project.

Plenary Walsh will maintain the bridges for 25 years.


Brian Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, brittmeyer@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.


Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, brittmeyer@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.