ShareThis Page
Former Brackenridge man pleads guilty to 2012 double murder in Arnold | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Former Brackenridge man pleads guilty to 2012 double murder in Arnold

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:31 p.m
664928_web1_vnd-briestensky-boxed
Robert Briestensky

An Allegheny County man was sentenced Tuesday to serve up to 30 years in prison for the fatal beating of an Arnold woman and her adult son more than six years ago.

Robert Briestensky, 45, formerly of Brackenridge, pleaded guilty to two lesser counts of third-degree murder in connection with the October 2012 slayings of Bonnie Broadwater, 46, and her 24-year-old son, Lance Holt. Prosecutors contend Briestensky used a child’s wooden baseball bat to bludgeon them to death.

His second double-murder trial was scheduled to begin next month. The guilty plea came less than a year after a Westmoreland County jury was unable to reach a verdict following a week-long trial in which prosecutors contended Briestensky intentionally murdered the mother and son over a debt. As a result, Common Pleas Court Judge Christopher Feliciani declared a mistrial.

District Attorney John Peck said Tuesday he agreed to allow Briestensky plead guilty to lesser charges to ensure a conviction.

“The first jury was 11-to-1 for acquittal. I’d like some justice for that family, and I have no doubt the defendant committed this crime,” Peck said.

Although no family members of Broadwater and Holt appeared in court on Tuesday, Peck said Broadwater’s sister signed off on the plea bargain deal and promised to submit a statement to the court. That statement had not been received in time for the hearing, Peck said.

Broadwater and Holt’s bodies were discovered in their home a week after the fatal beatings, police contended. During Briestensky’s first trial, the prosecution argued that his DNA and fingerprints linked him to the murders. Briestensky’s DNA was found on a ball cap and denim jacket found near the bodies. His fingerprints also were found on a soda can in the home, according to evidence introduced at trial.

The defense argued that an unidentified fourth person’s DNA also was found at the crime scene.

Briestensky said in court on Tuesday that he agreed to the plea bargain because it was in his best interest to do so. He faced mandatory life sentences, without the possibility of parole, if he was convicted of first-degree murder.

Feliciani ordered Briestensky to serve two concurrent sentences of 15-to-30 years in prison and gave him credit for time served since his arrest in March 2013. Briestensky also was ordered to pay more than $37,000 in restitution to pay for costs associated with the criminal investigation and autopsy of his victims.

Briestensky maintained his innocence during the first trial and rejected a proposed deal that called for him to plead guilty to lesser charges in exchange for a 20-to-40-year prison sentence. Now, defense attorney Greg Cecchetti said the time was right for a deal to end the case.

“I think he looked at convictions in cases and considered this offer in his best interest,” Cecchetti said.


Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.


Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, rcholodofsky@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.