ShareThis Page
Prosecutors dispute racial motivation alleged in charge against Mills mall shop owner | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Prosecutors dispute racial motivation alleged in charge against Mills mall shop owner

Madasyn Czebiniak
| Wednesday, February 13, 2019 4:16 p.m
746132_web1_vnd-wangheadshot
Tommy Wang
746132_web1_vnd-wang04-021219
The outside of the Shop off the Hanger store inside the Pittsburgh Mills Mall, which police allege was selling counterfeit items.

Allegheny County prosecutors are contesting the claim that the owner of a Pittsburgh Mills store was charged with selling counterfeit merchandise because of his race.

The District Attorney’s Office on Wednesday said the “police acted appropriately and without racial motivation” in the case against Tommy Wang.

“The police, pursuant to relevant training and experience, observed unlicensed, counterfeit merchandise displayed for sale on February 15, 2018 and made two subsequent purchases of such merchandise,” prosecutors said in a motion filed Wednesday with Allegheny County Judge Randal B. Todd.

The DA’s office asked Todd not to dismiss the case against Wang.

Wang’s attorney, Casey White, filed a motion Feb. 7 asking for the charge to be dismissed. He claimed that police specifically targeted Wang, 42, of Pittsburgh’s Highland Park neighborhood, because of his Asian race. White called the prosecution illegal.

Reached on Wednesday, White said he still hopes the case will be thrown out.

”It is my hope that Judge Todd takes a good look at the facts and circumstances surrounding this discriminatory investigation and finds that Mr. Wang was stereotyped and discriminated against,” he said.

The investigation into Wang started after Frazer police were called to the store inside the Pittsburgh Mills mall, Shop Off the Hanger, for a report of an attempted burglary in February 2018.

While there, former Frazer police Officer Lee Bartolicius saw more than 100 items of what appeared to be unlicensed, counterfeit merchandise in the front part of the store.

Investigators executed a search warrant, which allegedly turned up almost 1,800 suspected counterfeit items. They included glass coasters, flags, clocks, beer mugs and wine glasses containing Harley-Davidson, Pitt, Penn State, Pittsburgh Penguins and Pittsburgh Steelers logos.

Prosecutors said White’s motion omits several facts that were contained in an application for the search warrant and in the criminal complaint outlining the charges against Wang. They said the claim that the charge was based on race is “baseless when all the facts are considered.”

The DA’s motion argued that the officers involved had experience and training in trademark and counterfeit investigations and that Bartolicius believed he saw more than 100 items of unlicensed counterfeit merchandise at the store.

Wang is charged with one count of misdemeanor trademark counterfeiting. He is set to appear for a non-jury trial April 10.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, mczebiniak@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.