ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Natalie Nakles

Renatta Signorini
| Sunday, May 8, 2016, 11:09 p.m.
Natalie Nakles
Natalie Nakles

Noteworthy: A winner of the Wimmer Scholarship Competition that covered her undergraduate years at St. Vincent College in Latrobe, where she was named an Emerging Research Scholar, Nakles recently was accepted into the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine for her graduate studies. Nakles, who said Pitt was her top pick for graduate schools, is leaning toward a career in anesthesiology or neurology.

Age: 21

Residence: Unity

Family:Parents Jo Ellen Harr of Unity and Chris Nakles of Latrobe

Education: Greater Latrobe High School graduate in 2012; St. Vincent College graduate on May 7 with a degree in bioinformatics

Collegiate accomplishments: Nakles picked St. Vincent College not only because she was awarded a full scholarship, but because the small campus allowed her to have more individual attention from professors. She completed more than 100 research hours with a college associate professor in 2013. Nakles presented the results of her senior research project on anesthesiology last month during an academic conference. The research consisted of examining cancer and brain cells in rats. She shadowed an internist for 180 hours in 2014 and previously spent more than 200 hours volunteering at Excela Health Latrobe Hospital as an operating room assistant. Nakles was named to the Dean's List every semester at St. Vincent, where she tutored students in physiology and biochemistry. She was notified of her acceptance to Pitt by email on March 21.

Quote: “I was happy. I called all my relatives. I ran down to the science building to tell all my professors,” she said. “I'm just fascinated with pharmacology and how drugs exert their effects on people. It's a huge interest of mine.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me