ShareThis Page

Newsmaker: Michael Urick

Jeff Himler
| Sunday, June 5, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
Michael J. Urick
Michael J. Urick

Noteworthy: An assistant professor and graduate director of the master's of science in management program at St. Vincent College in Latrobe, Urick was named the Institute for Supply Management's Person of the Year in the education and learning category at the group's May 16 conference. Second vice president of the institute's Pittsburgh affiliate, he was recognized for his service to the organization and for outstanding achievement in academia including authoring articles and book chapters on research concerning generational issues in the workplace.

Age: 34

Residence: Hempfield

Family: Engaged to Janet Manning of Lexington, Ky.

Education: A bachelor's degree in accounting from St. Vincent College, master's degrees in human resource management and business ethics from Duquesne University and a doctorate in management, with a focus on organizational behavior, from the University of Cincinnati

Background: Urick started his career as an auditor and discovered older colleagues had negative attitudes toward members of his generation, with a perception that younger employees aren't as strongly committed to work. He said his goal is to help people in business have better interactions, regardless of their age, instead of focusing on their differences. Workplace issues he's identified include a gap in mentorship, with a need for more experienced staff members to have conversations with younger workers who may contribute new ideas and enthusiasm. He is working with a colleague at Duquesne University to study how much values really differ between different age groups.

Quote: “We have these age-based labels that aren't the same around the world. I think a lot of it comes from the traditions of the culture, what's valued. In Asian countries, I think, older workers are given a lot more respect than they are in the United States.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me