ShareThis Page
News

Newsmaker: John E. Blahovec

| Sunday, Oct. 16, 2016, 10:09 p.m.
John E. Blahovec
Submitted
John E. Blahovec

Noteworthy: Blahovec was given the Alumnus of Distinction award by the Pitt-Greensburg Alumni Association for 28 years as a judge for the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas. The association said his peers noted he was a fair and impartial judge who softened difficult courtroom situations with his wit and humor.

Age: 65

Residence: Hempfield

Family: Wife, Marylou; daughters, Rebecca and Rachel

Education: Attended Pitt-Greensburg for two years, then transferred to the Oakland campus of the University of Pittsburgh to complete his bachelor's degree in political science in 1973. He earned his juris doctor from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 1976.

Occupation: Senior judge in Westmoreland County. Elected in 1985 to the county bench, he served 10 years in family court and 18 years in criminal court until he retired in 2013. Before his election, Blahovec owned a law practice from 1976 to 1985 and taught at Westmoreland County Community College.

Background: Blahovec said he was the first in his family to attend college, so enrolling at a branch campus near his home enabled him to keep his job at Anderson's Market while commuting to classes for two years. A political science professor at the time, Mike Rubinoff, encouraged Blahovec to go to law school. “If it hadn't been for him, I might not have done it. Pitt at Greensburg was very important,” Blahovec said.

Quote: “It was a great honor,” Blahovec said of receiving the award. “It was nice to even think they remembered me. (Pitt-Greensburg) just gave me a great start...It was so much more intimate and personal. You got to know the professors. I still remember professors I had who had a huge impact on me.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me