ShareThis Page
News

'He hit me,' grandmother testifies

| Thursday, May 2, 2013, 9:30 p.m.

Her grandson punched her in the mouth in March, damaging two capped teeth, a grandmother reluctantly testified on Thursday.

“He hit me,” Nancy Kelly said during a preliminary hearing for Jacob Francis Colombin, 27.

Westmoreland County Assistant District Attorney Rebecca Calisti then asked Kelly about the damage to the capped teeth.

“They were knocked out,” Kelly replied.

Greensburg District Judge James Albert held Colombin for trial on charges of aggravated assault, simple assault and harassment.

Colombin struck his grandmother about 2:30 p.m. on March 24 at a North Lincoln Avenue home, Greensburg police said.

Early in her testimony, Kelly said several times that she didn't want to testify.

Calisti and defense attorney Anthony Bompiani debated whether the court could insist she testify.

“She doesn't want to testify,” Bompiani said at one point. “I don't want her to be confused into answering questions.”

“Do you want to testify in this case?” Albert asked.

“No,” Kelly replied.

“Because it's your grandson?” Albert asked.

“Yes. And I just don't want to press charges,” Kelly said.

Calisti insisted the witness should testify, and as the prosecutor continued to question Kelly, the grandmother eventually said her grandson punched her.

She went to the hospital for stitches and is undergoing further medical care, Kelly said.

Kelly was bleeding from her mouth when Greensburg Patrolman Donald Cole arrived, he testified.

“Her two teeth were on the kitchen table,” Cole said, adding that Kelly related, “Jacob punched her in the mouth, her grandson.”

Colombin had left the house before police arrived, Cole said. He was apprehended later.

Albert increased Colombin's bail from $30,000 to $50,000 straight.

Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me