ShareThis Page
Ford Motor Co. posts 1st quarterly loss in 2 years |

Ford Motor Co. posts 1st quarterly loss in 2 years

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, January 23, 2019 8:38 p.m
A United Auto Workers assemblyman works on a 2018 Ford F-150 truck in September 2018 at the Ford Rouge assembly plant in Dearborn, Mich. (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio, File)

DEARBORN, Mich. — Ford Motor Co., which has struggled overseas and saw U.S. sales fall last year, reported its first quarterly net loss in two years Wednesday.

The Dearborn, Mich., company said it lost $116 million, or 3 cents a share, in the fourth quarter, compared with a $2.52 billion profit a year earlier. It last posted a quarterly loss in the fourth quarter of 2016.

The loss included an $877 million one-time charge to revalue global pension assets due to a late-year market slide.

Ford made $3.68 billion for the full year, but that was only about half of what its net profit was in 2017. North America was its only profitable region.

“It’s not a year that we were happy with,” Chief Financial Officer Bob Shanks told reporters. “I think the fourth quarter kind of continued in that theme.”

The annual and fourth-quarter performances sent company executives scrambling to explain to Wall Street analysts why it was taking so long to restructure and roll out new products that could increase sales and profits.

CEO Jim Hackett, who replaced the ousted Mark Fields in May 2017, acknowledged frustration with the speed of Ford’s $11 billion restructuring effort.

“It is what it takes to build an industrial model that we’re talking about, to do it the right way, to not have it fall apart,” he said on a conference call with analysts.

Shanks said the company has a good handle on its underperformance in China and Europe and said it is addressing problems. The company, he said, is trying to flatten its structure in the United States to eliminate layers of bureaucracy, and those efforts will finish in April. Cost savings from Europe should start showing up this year, he said.

Hackett said the company was slow to refresh its vehicles around the globe. “We were constipated in product development,” he said, adding that Ford has updated its vehicles and propulsion systems while cutting costs.

Ford also is in the middle of a new product rollout largely in China and North America, and this month announced a restructuring of its European business that included layoffs and factory cuts. Redesigned vehicles coming in the U.S. this year include the Ford Explorer large SUV, the Ford Escape small SUV and the Ranger midsize pickup truck, all in growing segments of the market.

But because of an aging product lineup and the decision to start getting out of the sedan market as buyers switch to SUVs and trucks, U.S sales fell 3.5 percent last year. Ford lost 4 percentage points of market share for the year, yet its average sales price rose 14 percent to $40,746, according to the auto pricing site.

Without one-time items, Ford’s full-year profit was $1.30 per share, in line with the company’s recent guidance but short of Wall Street’s expectations. Analysts polled by FactSet expected $1.32 per share.

Also excluding one-time items, Ford posted a profit of 30 cents per share from October through December. That fell just short of analyst estimates of a profit of 31 cents.

The company made a pretax profit of $7.6 billion in North America for the year, down 6 percent from 2017. Still, U.S. unionized workers will get profit-sharing checks of $7,600 each in March. Its financial arm, Ford Credit, posted a $2.63 billion pretax profit, up 14 percent from 2017.

But the automaker lost $1.1 billion before taxes in its Asia Pacific region including China for the full year. It also posted pretax losses of $398 million Europe for the year, $678 million in South America, and $7 million in the Middle East and Africa.

Revenue rose 2 percent for the year to $160.3 billion, topping Wall Street estimates of $155.77 billion on stronger prices that customers paid for Ford vehicles, the company said. Its pretax profit margin was 4.4 percent. The company predicts “potential improvement” in revenue and profit margins this year.

Without $3.3 billion in headwinds of tariffs and extraordinary recall costs including faulty Takata air bags, the company’s performance in North America improved, Shanks said. The costs likely are not recurring, he said.

U.S. tariffs mainly on imported aluminum and steel, cost the company $750 million, while commodity costs unrelated to tariffs rose $1.1 billion. Ford also lost $750 million due to unfavorable currency exchange rates and it had $775 million in expenses linked to recalls, Shanks said.

Ford’s shares rose about 1 percent in after-hours trading Wednesday to $8.40.

Categories: Business | Wire stories
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.