ShareThis Page
62,000 pounds of raw meat recalled ahead of Memorial Day | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

62,000 pounds of raw meat recalled ahead of Memorial Day

Matt Rosenberg
1197876_web1_beef-3267625_1920
Aurora Packing Company is recalling more than 62,000 pounds of raw beef that may be contaminated with E. coli.

Talk about bad timing.

Aurora Packing Company is recalling more than 62,000 pounds of raw beef products that may be contaminated with E. coli, just days before one of the biggest grilling weekends of the year.

The USDA reported that North Aurora, Ill.-based company’s recalled products were packaged April 19 and shipped nationwide for further distribution and processing. The USDA provides a list of potentially contaminated products on its website, including product labels.

There have been no reports of illnesses related to the recall as Memorial Day weekend approaches.

USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service classified the announcement as a “Class I,” which is considered a high health risk. The recall can be a “situation where there is a reasonable probability that the use of the product will cause serious, adverse health consequences or death.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that E. coli infections generally occur three to four days after it’s consumed and can present in the form of severe stomach cramps, bloody diarrhea and vomiting.

About 60% of Americans barbecue over Memorial Day weekend, according to an estimate by WalletHub, making it the second-busiest grilling day of the year (Fourth of July, 62%). WalletHub estimates that $1.5 billion is spent on meat and seafood for Memorial Day.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Health Now | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.